Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Free Agency
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HardRightEdge" data-source="post: 493381"><p>Huff's roots are at safety, and I can't see us signing him without the intent of starting him there. He's played CB and nickel when injuries dictated, not necessarily as a coaching preference. It would be good to have a guy with his kind of versatility.</p><p> </p><p>I suppose if Williams does not get back to form and House can't stay healthy again, Huff could swing over there...that's the versatility benefit. But the real threat to Williams' job is House. Of all the D guys we've drafted in the last 3 years, House and Heyward are the guys I see as having the most upside.</p><p> </p><p>That is if House can stay healthy...you have to fear he might just be one of those brittle guys (or is it low threshold of pain?) like Mr. Starks.</p><p> </p><p>Signing Huff would likely require the release of either Jennings, McMillan or Bush. I think McMillan or Bush would be the casualty. Huff could swing to dime (or call it 3-safety...a distinction without a difference), making Bush expendable if we can find a gunner. MM loves having him around, though.</p><p> </p><p>I'd think Huff would be a more productive player out from under the Oakland cloud, and could be had at discount to true market value because of said cloud.</p><p> </p><p>I can't think of a reason McKenzie wouldn't give TT an honest evaluation if he asked for it.</p><p> </p><p>It's just a thought....<img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/wink.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-shortname=";)" /></p><p> </p><p>I see risk in Reed. Like Woodson and Polamalu, he's a freelancer who lives off his physical skills and guile. When the speed goes, look out, as some have commented elsewhere. There's nothing uglier than jumping a route or taking an aggressive angle and being late. I don't know if Reed is there yet. There seems to be mixed opinions.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HardRightEdge, post: 493381"] Huff's roots are at safety, and I can't see us signing him without the intent of starting him there. He's played CB and nickel when injuries dictated, not necessarily as a coaching preference. It would be good to have a guy with his kind of versatility. I suppose if Williams does not get back to form and House can't stay healthy again, Huff could swing over there...that's the versatility benefit. But the real threat to Williams' job is House. Of all the D guys we've drafted in the last 3 years, House and Heyward are the guys I see as having the most upside. That is if House can stay healthy...you have to fear he might just be one of those brittle guys (or is it low threshold of pain?) like Mr. Starks. Signing Huff would likely require the release of either Jennings, McMillan or Bush. I think McMillan or Bush would be the casualty. Huff could swing to dime (or call it 3-safety...a distinction without a difference), making Bush expendable if we can find a gunner. MM loves having him around, though. I'd think Huff would be a more productive player out from under the Oakland cloud, and could be had at discount to true market value because of said cloud. I can't think of a reason McKenzie wouldn't give TT an honest evaluation if he asked for it. It's just a thought....;) I see risk in Reed. Like Woodson and Polamalu, he's a freelancer who lives off his physical skills and guile. When the speed goes, look out, as some have commented elsewhere. There's nothing uglier than jumping a route or taking an aggressive angle and being late. I don't know if Reed is there yet. There seems to be mixed opinions. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 6:22 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
P
The Crew - 2026
Latest: Pugger
Today at 4:38 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: milani
Today at 3:46 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: milani
Today at 3:44 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: milani
Today at 3:40 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Free Agency
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
