Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="HardRightEdge" data-source="post: 492317">Huh? This was about Breer saying that landing a top free agent hasn't helped anybody win a SB in the last 10 years. I think you were "in the room", right? If by "top" you don't mean big $$$, the discussion is irrelevant. If you pay a "name brand" player a cheap contract because of age, infirmity or degraded skills, his failure is irrelevant to the FA argument. SF paying Moss a couple bucks last season for a couple bucks worth of performance says nothing one way or the other about the merits of FA s;pending. There was no risk...and not much reward as in common is such cases. I guess I just repeated myself. Like 3 times. I don't know how it could be clearer. By the way, you'll never know who was interested in a player, how many are interested, and how serious the interest might be. As far as Manning goes, reports were that DEN and SF were the only serious suitors in the end. But boy, DEN took a big risk with that pile of $$$, the risk is ongoing, and we'll see how it ends. But if all it did was get them out from under Tebow mania, that has it's own rewards.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 774 (members: 0, guests: 774)