Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Free Agency
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AmishMafia" data-source="post: 491776" data-attributes="member: 2846"><p>Reminder: We have players like Rodgers and CM3 that need to be retained.</p><p> </p><p>Spending money, because you have money, is about the most foolish thing an NFL GM can do. But think about that, we have $18M in cap space with one of the most talented rosters in all of football. TT did that not by quick reaction to perceived problems with spending on FAs.</p><p> </p><p>As with my post above, there are many more negatives than there are positives about signing impact FAs. As such, there are more mistakes than successes when it comes to signing them. What some don't seem to get, is that it is not always an option. Take DE. There has to be a person who fits this:</p><p> </p><p>1. Fits the system</p><p>2. Is reliable (not an injury risk)</p><p>3. Want to play in GB</p><p>4. Represents a significant increase in the talent level</p><p>5. Fits the locker room</p><p>6. Agrees to the $$$ the Packers feel he is worth</p><p>7. Will not adversely affect the team in any way shape or form.</p><p> </p><p>That weeds out most of the FAs.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AmishMafia, post: 491776, member: 2846"] Reminder: We have players like Rodgers and CM3 that need to be retained. Spending money, because you have money, is about the most foolish thing an NFL GM can do. But think about that, we have $18M in cap space with one of the most talented rosters in all of football. TT did that not by quick reaction to perceived problems with spending on FAs. As with my post above, there are many more negatives than there are positives about signing impact FAs. As such, there are more mistakes than successes when it comes to signing them. What some don't seem to get, is that it is not always an option. Take DE. There has to be a person who fits this: 1. Fits the system 2. Is reliable (not an injury risk) 3. Want to play in GB 4. Represents a significant increase in the talent level 5. Fits the locker room 6. Agrees to the $$$ the Packers feel he is worth 7. Will not adversely affect the team in any way shape or form. That weeds out most of the FAs. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
swhitset
Latest posts
G
2024 Packer UDFA Tracker....
Latest: GleefulGary
Today at 3:30 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 1st Rd pick #25 Jorden Morgan OL
Latest: gopkrs
Today at 3:00 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 3rd Rd #91 Ty’Ron Hopper LB
Latest: gopkrs
Today at 2:51 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
R
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: rmontro
Today at 2:03 AM
Draft Talk
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: AKCheese
Today at 12:51 AM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Free Agency
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top