1. Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!
    Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers.

    You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user.

    Sign Up or

    Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions. Furthermore, we hide most of the ads once you register as a member!
    Dismiss Notice

Franchise tag on Bubba Franks?

Discussion in 'Packer Fan Forum' started by GakkofNorway, Feb 9, 2005.

  1. GakkofNorway

    GakkofNorway Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2005
    Messages:
    2,249
    Ratings:
    +0
  2. eastcoastpacker

    eastcoastpacker Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2004
    Messages:
    484
    Ratings:
    +1
    I think it would be good to do it. But they need to use him more,he is a good tight end. I think they will make Steele the 2nd tight end,and let Martin go free agent.He been here a while and I don't think he has done much. JMO.
     
  3. fondypackfan

    fondypackfan Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2004
    Messages:
    219
    Ratings:
    +0
    With the little amount we use him I think it would be dumb to franchise him.
     
  4. sixone220

    sixone220 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2004
    Messages:
    688
    Ratings:
    +1
    martin doesn't get used, so he can't show anything.
     
  5. mattresell

    mattresell Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2005
    Messages:
    424
    Ratings:
    +0
    We've gotta keep Bubba. I've said before that he is an intagral part of our ground game. He's also very good in the red zone and has shown to be effective between the 20's when we use him. We don't have anyone to replace him, there's no one in free agency, and his franchise number would only be $2.6 million. At the very least we could put the transition tag on him which would cost just over $2 million. That would at least give us the chance to match any other offer.
     
  6. Zero2Cool

    Zero2Cool I own a website

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2004
    Messages:
    11,903
    Ratings:
    +8
    If they tag him maybe that's a sign they will use him more often in the coming season and realize they should have used him when they had the chance.
     
  7. NCPackerfan

    NCPackerfan Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2004
    Messages:
    203
    Ratings:
    +0
    If Favre returns I think it's important that the offense have as little turnover as possible. Even though Bubba's not utilzed enough, he and Favre seem to be on the same page most of the time. Brett's going to come back for one or maybe two more years. He doesn't need to be getting used to a new tight end.
     
  8. ArizonaPackerFan

    ArizonaPackerFan Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2004
    Messages:
    729
    Ratings:
    +0
    I think Franks is the toughest call to make for Packer management. I like Wahle better as a player, but it seems like we have more options on the O-line if we lose Wahle or Rivera than we do at tight end if we lose Franks. I'd hate to have to overpay to keep Franks because I don't think he's an elite tight end, but I'd also hate to lose him because no one behind him has really proven himself. It's going to be interesting to see how that plays out. We might have to go 3 wides with Fergy, Walker, and Driver :D :wink:
     
  9. IPBprez

    IPBprez Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2004
    Messages:
    2,883
    Ratings:
    +5
    I'd agree with Wahle being the better of the two players....

    The problem is with the end date on Wahle's contract - shrewd agent trick, I'm thinking. It could be they're saving their money for Wahle.. at least it smells that way - the next two weeks will tell... after that, it's all Draft, guys! Ted Thompson time...

    Oh, and don't forget, we have one other TE, besides Steele, waiting in the wings and he plays pretty much just like Bubba.... So, in some ways, Franks could be considered expendable...

    What we don't have is someone available to replace Wahle, not yet anyway! He's rated as one of the top five in the League at his position.
     
  10. uwbadger12000

    uwbadger12000 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2005
    Messages:
    958
    Ratings:
    +2
    If we lose Wahle, but not Rivera, I think we would put Kevin Barry at OG.
     
  11. ldlehrer

    ldlehrer Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2005
    Messages:
    48
    Ratings:
    +0
    I like Bubba Franks and he is important for the Packers. I think Wahle is a better player relative to their positions. I really would not pay Bubba Franks much more than he is getting paid now. I really do not see anyone else in the NFL paying much more than a million a year for Bubba Franks.
     
  12. uwbadger12000

    uwbadger12000 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2005
    Messages:
    958
    Ratings:
    +2
    Can't Barry replace Wahle?
     
  13. slackerbacker

    slackerbacker Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2004
    Messages:
    228
    Ratings:
    +0
    Barry and Steele are FAs this off season. Bubba has some value; he's a good blocker and an effective reciever in the Red Zone, but I don't think Farve trusts his route running. For whatever reason, Bubba just doesn't get a lot of balls thrown his way. That being the case, I can't see GB spending a lot of money on the TE position. I think the money could be better spent on a pure blocking TE. Sherman likes to move the TEs a lot and have them block out of motion so why not get a better blocking TE if that's what your going to primarily use them for? This type of TE would be much less expensive and allow GB to concentrate what little money they have on the DEF. Steven Alexander, Lions; Cam Cleeland, Rams; Dave Moore, Ken Dilger, and Dudley, Bucs; Lamont Hall, Aints; Brian Kozolwski, Skins; and Anthony Becht, Jets, are some of the more prominate UFA TEs available this off-season. Bubba is clearly the best TE available in FA and is unhappy w/ the way he's being used here. I doubt he'll sign for less to stay here.
     
  14. monkeyracer43

    monkeyracer43 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2005
    Messages:
    74
    Ratings:
    +0
    They would probably put Grey Reugamer in Wahle's spot and keep Berry in the U-71 package. Kevin Berry had problems controling his weight this season, and Ruegamer is the more athletic of the two. Either way, unless one of them steps next year, it will be a sore spot in the line.
     

Share This Page