Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="GB2009" data-source="post: 270166" data-attributes="member: 1937">His team didn't lose the game for him... well, not all of them. Defense played well, but here is my breakdown of the overrated Vikings.Here's my breakdown.2009 regular season, What most played claimed the Vikings to have:Vikings O-Line - One of the best in the leagueVikings Receivers - One of the best in the leagueVikings Running backs - One of the best tandems in the leagueEnd of 2009, What they really are:Vikings O-Line - Nearly got Brett Favre killed. I do not like the fact that Brett Favre went to the rivals, but I actually started feeling bad for him because he probably would have done better with the Packers O-line at the end of the year. Vike's O-line is way overrated. McKinnie is never the monster people think he is. Hutchinson is declining, but still good. Never should have let Matt Birk go. RG is a nobody. RT, is a overrated rookie.Vikings Receivers - Both Berrian and Harvin fumbled. However, Rice will be good for years to come. Their receiving is still not as good as the Pack.Vikings Running Backs - What more can I say... Did anyone else get the feeling that every time in the fourth quarter that Peterson touched the ball,it was going to be a fumble. Chester Taylor is one heck of a back and should have replaced Peterson for the second half.</blockquote>

Total: 918 (members: 1, guests: 917)