Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Magooch" data-source="post: 1061799" data-attributes="member: 17987">So maybe a dumb question where I'm just overlooking something or....you mentioned previously also how we rarely spend a first rd pick on a top 30 visit. But a good portion of the guys we brought in this year are virtually 100% locks to get taken in the first round. Why bother bringing a first-round player in for one of your limited visits if you're almost certainly not going to spend your first-round pick on them? Just hoping for the off-chance that one falls out of the first round into a position where we can acquire them with one of our later picks (or move ourselves into a position to do so)? Similarly we have discussed a bit how it seems like many of the most plugged-in and/or accurate draft predictors have us going either WR or CB in the first. If we are just going to have historical precedent outweigh everything else, who cares what the "plugged-in" guys are saying (if it doesn't line up with precedent)?</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 468 (members: 0, guests: 468)