Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Fire Matt LaFleur
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Magooch" data-source="post: 1090048" data-attributes="member: 17987"><p>A couple of random tidbits I've been thinking about. Not really trying to push one direction or the other, just some things to consider I guess...</p><p></p><p>- Some of our most important players, guys like Parsons, Kraft, Tom, Wyatt, etc are likely going to be out to start the season. If we bring in an entirely new coaching staff, how does that impact their returns? It's one thing to get back up to game-speed, it's another thing to do that AND come back into a new system with no real live reps.</p><p></p><p>- I'm not sure how long this current "window" is going to be open for. Not a cap wizard by any means but it looks like from my amateur view we should start to feel some more crunch in '27 and beyond until the potential '29 media deal kicks in. There will probably need to be some re-tooling after next season anyways.</p><p>You can take that either way...you might suggest we should run it back and maintain continuity for one more year before taking our licks the next year. You could also look at it and say we've got those aforementioned guys set to miss time already, a cap crunch possibly incoming, a small "window"...maybe you just rip off the bandaid and take a down year in '26 to completely reset.</p><p></p><p>- It seems far-fetched but could there really be another team involved, like a trade or something? I'm not sure why there would be so little "movement" and basically radio silence otherwise. By all accounts the team wants to continue with LaFleur so what's the hold up? Are they in a spot where they're not on the same page regarding money, but not so far apart that it's pointless? Do they just not like the idea of the "optics" of announcing an extension right now? (Or, alternatively, was the plan to extend but upon hearing widespread fan/media pushback they're reconsidering?) Even if it is a disagreement about money, I don't think anyone really gains leverage by drawing it out. Maybe both parties do want to extend and are roughly in agreement on compensation but not yet totally aligned on some additional terms/stipulations (assistant staff, responsibilities, etc)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Magooch, post: 1090048, member: 17987"] A couple of random tidbits I've been thinking about. Not really trying to push one direction or the other, just some things to consider I guess... - Some of our most important players, guys like Parsons, Kraft, Tom, Wyatt, etc are likely going to be out to start the season. If we bring in an entirely new coaching staff, how does that impact their returns? It's one thing to get back up to game-speed, it's another thing to do that AND come back into a new system with no real live reps. - I'm not sure how long this current "window" is going to be open for. Not a cap wizard by any means but it looks like from my amateur view we should start to feel some more crunch in '27 and beyond until the potential '29 media deal kicks in. There will probably need to be some re-tooling after next season anyways. You can take that either way...you might suggest we should run it back and maintain continuity for one more year before taking our licks the next year. You could also look at it and say we've got those aforementioned guys set to miss time already, a cap crunch possibly incoming, a small "window"...maybe you just rip off the bandaid and take a down year in '26 to completely reset. - It seems far-fetched but could there really be another team involved, like a trade or something? I'm not sure why there would be so little "movement" and basically radio silence otherwise. By all accounts the team wants to continue with LaFleur so what's the hold up? Are they in a spot where they're not on the same page regarding money, but not so far apart that it's pointless? Do they just not like the idea of the "optics" of announcing an extension right now? (Or, alternatively, was the plan to extend but upon hearing widespread fan/media pushback they're reconsidering?) Even if it is a disagreement about money, I don't think anyone really gains leverage by drawing it out. Maybe both parties do want to extend and are roughly in agreement on compensation but not yet totally aligned on some additional terms/stipulations (assistant staff, responsibilities, etc) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
H
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 7:18 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 6:36 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 6:20 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
R
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: rmontro
Today at 1:11 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 10:10 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Fire Matt LaFleur
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
