Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Fire Matt LaFleur
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Magooch" data-source="post: 1089883" data-attributes="member: 17987"><p>And for better or worse, it seems like the team is most likely leaning towards #4.</p><p></p><p>My preferences/stipulations for that to be the case:</p><p></p><p>1. Organizational hierarchy is restructured so that head coach reports direct to GM</p><p>2. Bisaccia is fired immediately</p><p>3. Provides clarity on the role of Stenavich as OC. If Matt is installing the offensive structure and calling the plays, what is the OC doing? </p><p>4. Hiring of additional analytics, support, and "game management" staff. Make one of your main focuses to "pre-script" late game situations and lean MUCH heavier on analytics and predefined scenario-scripts rather than emotional or "gut" calls</p><p></p><p>As it stands, it seems like we effectively have two core responsibilities that LaFleur is expected to fill.</p><p>First and foremost arguably is that of the offensive "architect". He is the guy who designs our offensive system, crafts our game planning week to week, sets the script, identifies the matchups to exploit, etc.</p><p>Second is that of "game manager" - where he is responsible for clock management, risk decisions (aggressive vs conservative), situational football, 4th down decisions, etc. </p><p>We tend to assume that both of these should be handled by one person but the reality is that IMO LaFleur excels at "offensive architect" but struggles mightily with "game manager". So IMO the way forward has to involve separating these two roles. </p><p></p><p>This was probably in large part the idea with Bisaccia, but either a.) He is inept; b.) his input is not being listened to; or c.) some combination of both - and it obviously has not worked. Our "game management" did not improve and our special teams got worse in making this transition. That has to be a huge topic to be addressed if we are to see any improvement going forward.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Magooch, post: 1089883, member: 17987"] And for better or worse, it seems like the team is most likely leaning towards #4. My preferences/stipulations for that to be the case: 1. Organizational hierarchy is restructured so that head coach reports direct to GM 2. Bisaccia is fired immediately 3. Provides clarity on the role of Stenavich as OC. If Matt is installing the offensive structure and calling the plays, what is the OC doing? 4. Hiring of additional analytics, support, and "game management" staff. Make one of your main focuses to "pre-script" late game situations and lean MUCH heavier on analytics and predefined scenario-scripts rather than emotional or "gut" calls As it stands, it seems like we effectively have two core responsibilities that LaFleur is expected to fill. First and foremost arguably is that of the offensive "architect". He is the guy who designs our offensive system, crafts our game planning week to week, sets the script, identifies the matchups to exploit, etc. Second is that of "game manager" - where he is responsible for clock management, risk decisions (aggressive vs conservative), situational football, 4th down decisions, etc. We tend to assume that both of these should be handled by one person but the reality is that IMO LaFleur excels at "offensive architect" but struggles mightily with "game manager". So IMO the way forward has to involve separating these two roles. This was probably in large part the idea with Bisaccia, but either a.) He is inept; b.) his input is not being listened to; or c.) some combination of both - and it obviously has not worked. Our "game management" did not improve and our special teams got worse in making this transition. That has to be a huge topic to be addressed if we are to see any improvement going forward. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Heyjoe4
The General
Latest posts
H
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Heyjoe4
1 minute ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: Heyjoe4
10 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
R
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: rmontro
Today at 1:11 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 10:10 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
S
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: Schultz
Yesterday at 1:59 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Fire Matt LaFleur
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
