Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Fire Matt LaFleur
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Magooch" data-source="post: 1089682" data-attributes="member: 17987"><p>I've thought this before but in some ways I think this basically neuters a number of Matt's biggest strengths. In principle I think he is a good play caller, but situationally he stinks. He can't manage offensive play calling AND head coach decision-making in the moment. </p><p></p><p>And regarding our OC, maybe I'm off base but I've consistently had a sense that Stenavich is basically OC in name only - he's an OL coach that we really value and didn't want to lose, so we promoted him to OC. But the offensive "system" is still LaFleur's, and LaFleur does the offensive play calling, so I'm not really sure what part of the OC role Stenavich is even doing in the first place. </p><p></p><p>But anyhow, I said it a few days ago - the idea of stripping Matt of the offense and putting in a new OC and play caller is fine and all, but at that point...what does Matt offer above others at that point? His biggest strength is his approach to offense. All of his other "head coach qualities" are wholly unremarkable.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Magooch, post: 1089682, member: 17987"] I've thought this before but in some ways I think this basically neuters a number of Matt's biggest strengths. In principle I think he is a good play caller, but situationally he stinks. He can't manage offensive play calling AND head coach decision-making in the moment. And regarding our OC, maybe I'm off base but I've consistently had a sense that Stenavich is basically OC in name only - he's an OL coach that we really value and didn't want to lose, so we promoted him to OC. But the offensive "system" is still LaFleur's, and LaFleur does the offensive play calling, so I'm not really sure what part of the OC role Stenavich is even doing in the first place. But anyhow, I said it a few days ago - the idea of stripping Matt of the offense and putting in a new OC and play caller is fine and all, but at that point...what does Matt offer above others at that point? His biggest strength is his approach to offense. All of his other "head coach qualities" are wholly unremarkable. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
R
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: rmontro
Today at 1:11 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 10:10 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 5:34 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
S
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: Schultz
Yesterday at 1:59 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 10:55 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Fire Matt LaFleur
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top