Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1089354" data-attributes="member: 10086">We were talented enough to Win. Yet it’s undeniable our Head Coach put us in positions to lose. That works against a .500 team. It doesn’t work against hungry, playoff caliber teams.Matt gave up again when he let the playclock expireIt was 3rd n 10 at the chi21 for the Win. He literally gave up. You will NOT convince me he didn’t know the play clock expired.He purposely and willfully chose 3rd n 15 and -5 yards vs a timeout.From Chi21 we were winning by +3. If you get a 6-9 yard play?  It’s 4th n 4 or less from the Chicago14-15 and Chicago uses their last timeout around 2:55 gameclock.Go for the Win. If you hit a 1st down you can take the clock to 1:20 area just running it up the gut. 3 tries if you want to give up do it after winding the clock and getting a chance to put the game away. Technically could Go for it on 4th down and even if we miss? it’s Chicago ball with :70 sec and 90+ yards to go for a Win or about 60 yards to go to tie but with ZERO timeouts.It was a bonus 4-down territory if we get a 6-9 yard play imo and we’re between the Chi12-15 yard line. Instead we chose -5 and a longer FG try to save a timeout??That’s worst case. If you make a 1st down at the Chi10 and then score a TD?  Game over. Green Bay winsby  2-scores.</blockquote>

Total: 1,081 (members: 1, guests: 1,080)