Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Fire Matt LaFleur
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1086738" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>I also actually do NOT agree with the Matt’s play call on 4th n inches. Yet I’m not sure that’s worth firing our Entire Staff and firing Matt is scrapping the entire Staff imo.</p><p> While I know Baltimore would just Run the clock. Literally RUN the clock. Pinning our opponent inside the 10-20 area was the correct choice. A 50 net leaves Baltimore at their own 15. Pretty reasonable chance to hold them to a FG needing 85 yards there. Instead we handed them a bonus FG and quickly on that drive.</p><p></p><p>The other aspect is you could tell they were having their way with us. So possibly shortening the game (less opponent possessions) can help. Even if Baltimore still gets 3pts, they’d have to go 55+ yards to do it, which burns an extra ~4 minutes of game clock. If they didn’t get a FG and they Punt to us? It’s only burning gameclock. Which if anything shortens their last possession. Either way it benefits the Packers.</p><p></p><p>The other aspect. It’s a completely different scenario if we’re on Bal40 etc.. because a 1st down, plus 3+ ensuing plays should get us into FG range.</p><p> OR </p><p>IF GB Is < Bal8 yard line. 1yard and it’s 1st n Goal from the Bal7. A high % you’d stick that for TD in 4 tried with how the game was more Offensive. </p><p></p><p>Here in that particular turnover on Downs. We’re at the GB34! Even IF we had converted 1 yard? It’s still no guarantee we get points??! It’s only a guarantee they get at least a FG if we miss. So none of that makes a lick of sense before you even discuss the type of play we ran. That was a very compulsive 4th down try in a 7pt game that early on.</p><p></p><p><img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/roflmao.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":roflmao:" title="ROFLMAO :roflmao:" data-shortname=":roflmao:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 1086738, member: 10086"] I also actually do NOT agree with the Matt’s play call on 4th n inches. Yet I’m not sure that’s worth firing our Entire Staff and firing Matt is scrapping the entire Staff imo. While I know Baltimore would just Run the clock. Literally RUN the clock. Pinning our opponent inside the 10-20 area was the correct choice. A 50 net leaves Baltimore at their own 15. Pretty reasonable chance to hold them to a FG needing 85 yards there. Instead we handed them a bonus FG and quickly on that drive. The other aspect is you could tell they were having their way with us. So possibly shortening the game (less opponent possessions) can help. Even if Baltimore still gets 3pts, they’d have to go 55+ yards to do it, which burns an extra ~4 minutes of game clock. If they didn’t get a FG and they Punt to us? It’s only burning gameclock. Which if anything shortens their last possession. Either way it benefits the Packers. The other aspect. It’s a completely different scenario if we’re on Bal40 etc.. because a 1st down, plus 3+ ensuing plays should get us into FG range. OR IF GB Is < Bal8 yard line. 1yard and it’s 1st n Goal from the Bal7. A high % you’d stick that for TD in 4 tried with how the game was more Offensive. Here in that particular turnover on Downs. We’re at the GB34! Even IF we had converted 1 yard? It’s still no guarantee we get points??! It’s only a guarantee they get at least a FG if we miss. So none of that makes a lick of sense before you even discuss the type of play we ran. That was a very compulsive 4th down try in a 7pt game that early on. :roflmao: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
R
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: rmontro
22 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
S
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: Schultz
Today at 1:59 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: tynimiller
Today at 12:04 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 10:55 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
P
The Crew - 2026
Latest: Pugger
Yesterday at 4:38 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Fire Matt LaFleur
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
