Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Fire Matt LaFleur
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Magooch" data-source="post: 1085266" data-attributes="member: 17987"><p>Yeah, it's a tough call. I get that Bisaccia isn't the one who bobbled the kick...but at the same time at this point I'm not sure he really deserves the benefit of the doubt. In the same way... it wasn't Joe Barry who was out there missing tackles or assignments or blowing coverages, but ultimately he's still responsible for the on-field product. If we're not going to hold our couches accountable for the things the players under their charge are doing, why even bother having coaches in the first place? </p><p></p><p>And it'd be one thing if we'd had generally good special teams all year long and just had a guy come up short in an extremely high-pressure moment. Players are human, it happens. But when special teams is repeatedly a problem week-in and week-out I have to think it goes deeper than just simple player error. </p><p></p><p>By extension then my general feeling is that if Bisaccia should be held to account for his units' players...then LaFleur should similarly be held accountable for the coaching staff beneath him. When Matt gives Joe Barry chance after chance after chance, he's saying "I am satisfied with my defense's performances". When Matt hears all season long that Drayton is a liability on ST and doesn't do anything about it until special teams are a huge factor in playoff elimination, he's saying "You have to be directly responsible for a loss in the biggest game of the year before I will take action". When Matt continues with Bisaccia AND promotes him to an assistant head coach role, he's saying "Your performances have been so outstanding that you deserve to be rewarded for them". Once again, I think Matt does a lot of good things, but I can't get on board with any of that. I said it months ago - the company he keeps around him and his unwillingness to make hard decisions regarding his colleagues are an anchor that will prevent him from reaching the next level as a coach.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Magooch, post: 1085266, member: 17987"] Yeah, it's a tough call. I get that Bisaccia isn't the one who bobbled the kick...but at the same time at this point I'm not sure he really deserves the benefit of the doubt. In the same way... it wasn't Joe Barry who was out there missing tackles or assignments or blowing coverages, but ultimately he's still responsible for the on-field product. If we're not going to hold our couches accountable for the things the players under their charge are doing, why even bother having coaches in the first place? And it'd be one thing if we'd had generally good special teams all year long and just had a guy come up short in an extremely high-pressure moment. Players are human, it happens. But when special teams is repeatedly a problem week-in and week-out I have to think it goes deeper than just simple player error. By extension then my general feeling is that if Bisaccia should be held to account for his units' players...then LaFleur should similarly be held accountable for the coaching staff beneath him. When Matt gives Joe Barry chance after chance after chance, he's saying "I am satisfied with my defense's performances". When Matt hears all season long that Drayton is a liability on ST and doesn't do anything about it until special teams are a huge factor in playoff elimination, he's saying "You have to be directly responsible for a loss in the biggest game of the year before I will take action". When Matt continues with Bisaccia AND promotes him to an assistant head coach role, he's saying "Your performances have been so outstanding that you deserve to be rewarded for them". Once again, I think Matt does a lot of good things, but I can't get on board with any of that. I said it months ago - the company he keeps around him and his unwillingness to make hard decisions regarding his colleagues are an anchor that will prevent him from reaching the next level as a coach. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
tynimiller
Latest posts
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: tynimiller
5 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 10:55 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 10:10 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
P
The Crew - 2026
Latest: Pugger
Yesterday at 4:38 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 3:44 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Fire Matt LaFleur
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
