Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Fire Matt LaFleur
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Magooch" data-source="post: 1085130" data-attributes="member: 17987"><p>This is getting off on a bit of a tangent, but I'm curious if anyone's got any thoughts/insight on the current hierarchy/organizational structure.</p><p></p><p>As I understand it, right now, both LaFleur and Gute report directly to the president. Gute couldn't unilaterally make the decision to move on from LaFleur; only the president can make that move happen. (On paper, at least. I don't know how hands-on the president is, it's perfectly conceivable if Gute says "I want a new coach" that Policy might just rubber-stamp that move)</p><p></p><p>But I also wonder if there wouldn't be some value in a more "traditional" structure where the coach reports directly to the GM and the GM reports directly to the president.... </p><p></p><p>Maybe I am off-base in all of that, but that was at least my impression of the current situation... I don't know if Gute would do any differently in that circumstance but food for thought.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Magooch, post: 1085130, member: 17987"] This is getting off on a bit of a tangent, but I'm curious if anyone's got any thoughts/insight on the current hierarchy/organizational structure. As I understand it, right now, both LaFleur and Gute report directly to the president. Gute couldn't unilaterally make the decision to move on from LaFleur; only the president can make that move happen. (On paper, at least. I don't know how hands-on the president is, it's perfectly conceivable if Gute says "I want a new coach" that Policy might just rubber-stamp that move) But I also wonder if there wouldn't be some value in a more "traditional" structure where the coach reports directly to the GM and the GM reports directly to the president.... Maybe I am off-base in all of that, but that was at least my impression of the current situation... I don't know if Gute would do any differently in that circumstance but food for thought. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
H
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: Heyjoe4
25 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Heyjoe4
28 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: DoURant
Yesterday at 8:17 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
P
The Crew - 2026
Latest: Pugger
Yesterday at 4:38 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 3:44 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Fire Matt LaFleur
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top