Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1085114" data-attributes="member: 10086">Good Work my friend!   That really took some work I commend your assembly of information. So I was wrong, It’s 100% more than I thought! That said he was originally  portrayed as #32 ranking, which I kinda knew wasn’t correct either. Let’s call Whelan in the bottom 20-25% area inside <20 which is still Lower than expected.   So Whelan is crushing the ball almost league best, his coverage unit is top 25%, but his inside <20 is relatively poor range.  Might be Whelan has a big leg, but he’s somewhat unrefined with a few more unnecessary Touchbacks (7) than expected instead of converting those to  leaving our opponent deep <20. Interesting.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 1,240 (members: 0, guests: 1,240)