Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Fire Matt LaFleur
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Magooch" data-source="post: 1085094" data-attributes="member: 17987"><p>In any case, this is getting a bit in the weeds. My point is this: under Bisaccia, the Packers' special teams units have been - on their VERY BEST day - an "average" unit. </p><p>And more often than not, they are significantly below average on the whole, generally finding themselves in the bottom 25% of the league for the majority of Bisaccia's time in Green Bay. </p><p></p><p>As such, when LaFleur refuses to fire Bisaccia - and moreover says things like "special teams have done a pretty good job," it suggests one of two things:</p><p></p><p>1. Matt is perfectly content with our special teams performances, or at minimum does not feel it is a problem that needs addressed with any urgency. </p><p></p><p>or 2. Matt is not satisfied with our special teams performances, but is unwilling or unable to make any meaningful personnel changes at this point. </p><p></p><p>We saw it before with Barry (how long did LaFleur give him his vote of confidence?) and we're seeing it again with Bisaccia. </p><p></p><p>Now I suppose you could argue that it's not all on Bisaccia and that he isn't getting good enough personnel to work with (although IMO he has been afforded far more special teams "latitude" than most Packers ST coordinators in recent history). Maybe that is the case, but I don't think that speaks too well for LaFleur either as he is likely the one choosing to limit which players are available for special teams snaps, which would more or less loop back to "option 1" in that he seemingly just doesn't value special teams all that much at all. </p><p></p><p>No matter how you slice it, I don't think Matt's handling of our special teams situation reflects well on him.</p><p></p><p>(And don't even get me started again on the absolute debacle that was the McManus injury/Havrisik situation)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Magooch, post: 1085094, member: 17987"] In any case, this is getting a bit in the weeds. My point is this: under Bisaccia, the Packers' special teams units have been - on their VERY BEST day - an "average" unit. And more often than not, they are significantly below average on the whole, generally finding themselves in the bottom 25% of the league for the majority of Bisaccia's time in Green Bay. As such, when LaFleur refuses to fire Bisaccia - and moreover says things like "special teams have done a pretty good job," it suggests one of two things: 1. Matt is perfectly content with our special teams performances, or at minimum does not feel it is a problem that needs addressed with any urgency. or 2. Matt is not satisfied with our special teams performances, but is unwilling or unable to make any meaningful personnel changes at this point. We saw it before with Barry (how long did LaFleur give him his vote of confidence?) and we're seeing it again with Bisaccia. Now I suppose you could argue that it's not all on Bisaccia and that he isn't getting good enough personnel to work with (although IMO he has been afforded far more special teams "latitude" than most Packers ST coordinators in recent history). Maybe that is the case, but I don't think that speaks too well for LaFleur either as he is likely the one choosing to limit which players are available for special teams snaps, which would more or less loop back to "option 1" in that he seemingly just doesn't value special teams all that much at all. No matter how you slice it, I don't think Matt's handling of our special teams situation reflects well on him. (And don't even get me started again on the absolute debacle that was the McManus injury/Havrisik situation) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
H
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: Heyjoe4
24 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Heyjoe4
27 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: DoURant
Yesterday at 8:17 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
P
The Crew - 2026
Latest: Pugger
Yesterday at 4:38 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 3:44 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Fire Matt LaFleur
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
