Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Fire Matt LaFleur
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Magooch" data-source="post: 1085077" data-attributes="member: 17987"><p>That's.....that's the whole point of a percentile measure??? Which is precisely why I listed both the aggregate total and the percent ranking... in fact every number given is based on "per attempt" or as a percentage of total attempts. None of those are raw/aggregate numbers/rankings. </p><p></p><p>See above. The Packers (and by extension Whelan) are #32 in total <strong>number </strong>of punts inside the 20 and #28 in <strong>percentage</strong> of punts downed inside the 20.</p><p></p><p>I cannot find any way to tweak the numbers to make Whelan 17th in <20 percentage. Not sure where this is coming form</p><p></p><p>I mean, yes and no. Again, that's why both are listed...</p><p></p><p>I disagree. In fact I would suggest that the above-cited numbers such as opponent field goal/extra point, team field goal/extra point <strong>percentage</strong>, yards allowed against <strong>per return</strong>, net yards <strong>per punt attempt</strong>, etc are considerably <em>less </em>misleading than previously-mentioned <strong>total</strong> net punt yards, opponent XPM/XPA, opponent FGM/FGA, team XPM/XPA, team FGM/FGA, etc., which are indeed all "count-based" numbers.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Magooch, post: 1085077, member: 17987"] That's.....that's the whole point of a percentile measure??? Which is precisely why I listed both the aggregate total and the percent ranking... in fact every number given is based on "per attempt" or as a percentage of total attempts. None of those are raw/aggregate numbers/rankings. See above. The Packers (and by extension Whelan) are #32 in total [B]number [/B]of punts inside the 20 and #28 in [B]percentage[/B] of punts downed inside the 20. I cannot find any way to tweak the numbers to make Whelan 17th in <20 percentage. Not sure where this is coming form I mean, yes and no. Again, that's why both are listed... I disagree. In fact I would suggest that the above-cited numbers such as opponent field goal/extra point, team field goal/extra point [B]percentage[/B], yards allowed against [B]per return[/B], net yards [B]per punt attempt[/B], etc are considerably [I]less [/I]misleading than previously-mentioned [B]total[/B] net punt yards, opponent XPM/XPA, opponent FGM/FGA, team XPM/XPA, team FGM/FGA, etc., which are indeed all "count-based" numbers. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
H
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: Heyjoe4
24 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Heyjoe4
27 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: DoURant
Yesterday at 8:17 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
P
The Crew - 2026
Latest: Pugger
Yesterday at 4:38 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 3:44 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Fire Matt LaFleur
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top