Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pkrjones" data-source="post: 591334" data-attributes="member: 9982">Dallas' top 2 receiver's regular season stats (Bryant & Witten): 152 receptions, 2,023 yds, 21 TD's.  GB's (Nelson & Cobb): 189 receptions, 2,806 yds., 25 TD's.  Advantage GB!Top 3 ~ Dallas (add T. Williams): 189 receptions, 2,644 yds., 22 TD's.  GB (add Adams):  227 receptions, 3,252 yds., 28 TD's.  Advantage GB!Top 4 ~  Dallas (add Beasley): 226 receptions, 3,064 yds., 26 TD's.  GB (add Lacy): 269 receptions, 3,679 yds., 32 TD's.  Advantage GB!Top 5 ~  Dallas (add Murray): 283 receptions, 3,480 yds, 26 TD's.  GB (add Quarless): 298 receptions, 4,002 yds., 35 TD's.  Advantage GB!Rushing:D. Murray:  392 rushes, 1,845 yds., 4.7 yds/carry, 24.5 carries/gm, 13 TD's. E. Lacy:  246 rushes, 1,139 yds., 4.6 yds/carry, 15.4 carries/gm, 9 TD'sAdvantage Dallas, only by sheer volume of touches.  Productivity is similar/carry.QB's:  Rodgers will quite possibly be a 2nd time MVP, Romo - zero.You can argue until you're blue in the face, J8, that Dallas' offensive weapons (Romo, Murray, Bryant, Witten, Williams, & Beasley) are better than GB's (Rodgers, Nelson, Cobb, Adams, Lacy, & Quarless)... but I'm tired of telling you that you're wrong.  You're wrong, and I dare you to find a serious NFL fan that would back you... and I doubt it will be on a Packer forum.</blockquote>

Total: 383 (members: 3, guests: 380)