Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Zero2Cool" data-source="post: 153824" data-attributes="member: 43">Again, getting a RB in the first rd is more costly than a DT. You can sign a DT for cheaper than you can  RB.  I hate to say that because it sounds like I'm making excuses for the drafting, but I'm really not. I'm just throwing you the logical explanation that comes to MY mind.If the Packers felt Lynch could be a stud, they would have made the move. As I said earlier though. A RB is easier to replace than some other positions. Especially with the ZBS we employ.Do I think B Jack is a starter? No. I don't think he's all that good to be perfectly honest with you.  I have more faith in Vernand Morency than I do with Jackson.   I can't much say I agree with the pick of Jackson, but I can understand why we took a RB instead of a WR with that second rd pick.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 999 (members: 0, guests: 999)