Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Favre's status
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Zombieslayer" data-source="post: 153795" data-attributes="member: 627"><p>That's just silly. I posted this thread to gauge what other forum folks thought about his declining numbers, if I should be worried.</p><p></p><p>| 2003 gnb | 16 | 308 471 65.4 3361 7.1 32 21 | 18 15 0 |</p><p>| 2004 gnb | 16 | 346 540 64.1 4088 7.6 30 17 | 16 36 0 |</p><p>| 2005 gnb | 16 | 372 607 61.3 3881 6.4 20 29 | 18 62 0 |</p><p>| 2006 gnb | 16 | 343 613 56.0 3885 6.3 18 18 | 23 29 1 |</p><p></p><p>Now, as a fan of football, I know full well it's a team sport. With no team, no matter how good of a football player you are, you won't get the results you need.</p><p></p><p>Favre is obviously not the same QB he was in the mid-90s. He's not as fast, he's a lot more injured, and the gambles he takes are less successful than they were before because his skills have declined.</p><p></p><p>However, he still moves the chains. 2005 started off with an injury to Javon Walker, who at the time was the Packer's best WR. Then it all went downhill. By the end of the season, Green and Davenport, our #1 and #2 RBs were out. Walker and Ferguson were out and we were left with Driver and Chatman as our WRs. Franks and David Martin at TE both were injured and we were left with Donald Lee and Ben Steele.</p><p></p><p>So to make matters worse, Favre got desperate and tried to make plays that weren't there. Sometimes he pulled it off. More often than not, it exploded in our faces. He had a forgettable year and it was a bad year to be a Packers fan.</p><p></p><p>2006 looked better, but we had 3 starters on the OL, and had to keep a TE and a RB back almost at all times or else we probably would have led the league in most sacks allowed. Opposing defenses had no problem rushing only four men, and keeping seven back to cover three receivers. Do the math. It is absolutely amazing Driver had a year like he did, proving he's one of the better WRs in the NFL. Unfortunately, Jennings got injured in week 6 and never fully recovered. He looked spectacular in his first five games.</p><p></p><p>2007 will prove if Favre is washed up or still has it.</p><p></p><p>I consider myself pretty fair when it comes to assessments. I can see the whole picture, and as I said several times, a lot of the blame does go on Favre. But, I think it's more you who's anti-Favre than us who are overly forgiving.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Zombieslayer, post: 153795, member: 627"] That's just silly. I posted this thread to gauge what other forum folks thought about his declining numbers, if I should be worried. | 2003 gnb | 16 | 308 471 65.4 3361 7.1 32 21 | 18 15 0 | | 2004 gnb | 16 | 346 540 64.1 4088 7.6 30 17 | 16 36 0 | | 2005 gnb | 16 | 372 607 61.3 3881 6.4 20 29 | 18 62 0 | | 2006 gnb | 16 | 343 613 56.0 3885 6.3 18 18 | 23 29 1 | Now, as a fan of football, I know full well it's a team sport. With no team, no matter how good of a football player you are, you won't get the results you need. Favre is obviously not the same QB he was in the mid-90s. He's not as fast, he's a lot more injured, and the gambles he takes are less successful than they were before because his skills have declined. However, he still moves the chains. 2005 started off with an injury to Javon Walker, who at the time was the Packer's best WR. Then it all went downhill. By the end of the season, Green and Davenport, our #1 and #2 RBs were out. Walker and Ferguson were out and we were left with Driver and Chatman as our WRs. Franks and David Martin at TE both were injured and we were left with Donald Lee and Ben Steele. So to make matters worse, Favre got desperate and tried to make plays that weren't there. Sometimes he pulled it off. More often than not, it exploded in our faces. He had a forgettable year and it was a bad year to be a Packers fan. 2006 looked better, but we had 3 starters on the OL, and had to keep a TE and a RB back almost at all times or else we probably would have led the league in most sacks allowed. Opposing defenses had no problem rushing only four men, and keeping seven back to cover three receivers. Do the math. It is absolutely amazing Driver had a year like he did, proving he's one of the better WRs in the NFL. Unfortunately, Jennings got injured in week 6 and never fully recovered. He looked spectacular in his first five games. 2007 will prove if Favre is washed up or still has it. I consider myself pretty fair when it comes to assessments. I can see the whole picture, and as I said several times, a lot of the blame does go on Favre. But, I think it's more you who's anti-Favre than us who are overly forgiving. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
tynimiller
shockerx
Latest posts
The Crew - 2026
Latest: weeds
Today at 5:31 AM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: El Guapo
Yesterday at 10:50 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 5:13 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 12:42 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 11:14 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Favre's status
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
