FrankRizzo
Cheesehead
Can you imagine?
If the 49ers weren't so stupid back in that 2005 Draft?
If the 49ers weren't so stupid back in that 2005 Draft?
You must be logged in to see this image or video!
Easy there big fella. The reason the A. Smith was chosen by the Niners that year instead of ARodge was because of the Niners QB coach at the time. Mr. Mike McCarthy.
I doubt the analysis was so simplistic regarding the NFL draft picks. McCarthy has said it was a very close call but the 9’ers decided on Smith because they thought he was more athletic than Rodgers. I also remember reading the concern of some that Rodgers was a “Tedford” QB, which wasn’t a compliment at the time, but I don't know if that figured into the 9ers' evaluation.All I can guess is, as often has been the case (Dan McGwire before Farve in 91, Sam Bowie before Michael Jordan in 84, Greg Oden over Kevin Durant in 08-09), they overvalued heighth and just took the taller specimen.
I remember reading about the Seahawks choosing Dan McGwire over Favre.Regarding Favre, the story goes that Wolf had evaluated his senior season and was about to leave when an assistant coach at Southern Miss implored him to look at tape from Favre’s junior season. (Remember Favre had a pretty bad car accident before his senior year that affected his play.) So Wolf went back and looked at his junior season and that evaluation convinced him Favre was the best player in that draft. I’ll bet Wolf was the exception and other teams were evaluating Favre on his senior season.
If that’s true, it’s another example of how important Harlan’s decision to hire one “football man” to be in control of all football operations was. Before that the lines of authority were blurred in Green Bay (after Lombardi) with reports of the executive boards’ interference with football operations. It’s seems so obvious that someone completely immersed in the draft should be in charge of it. But even Harlan deviated from that idea when he promoted Sherman to the GM job. Look at the difference Thompson made in the draft using almost entirely the same scouts and personnel department.The scouts were divided on which of the two to take, and either the owner or the team president of Seattle at the time asked "who's taller", and they said Dan McGwire. He said take him then.
Very true.If that’s true, it’s another example of how important Harlan’s decision to hire one “football man” to be in control of all football operations was. Before that the lines of authority were blurred in Green Bay (after Lombardi) with reports of the executive boards’ interference with football operations. It’s seems so obvious that someone completely immersed in the draft should be in charge of it. But even Harlan deviated from that idea when he promoted Sherman to the GM job. Look at the difference Thompson made in the draft using almost entirely the same scouts and personnel department.
That's why Atalanta drafted him instead of Wolf I guess.I doubt the analysis was so simplistic regarding the NFL draft picks. McCarthy has said it was a very close call but the 9’ers decided on Smith because they thought he was more athletic than Rodgers. I also remember reading the concern of some that Rodgers was a “Tedford” QB, which wasn’t a compliment at the time, but I don't know if that figured into the 9ers' evaluation.
Regarding Favre, the story goes that Wolf had evaluated his senior season and was about to leave when an assistant coach at Southern Miss implored him to look at tape from Favre’s junior season. (Remember Favre had a pretty bad car accident before his senior year that affected his play.) So Wolf went back and looked at his junior season and that evaluation convinced him Favre was the best player in that draft. I’ll bet Wolf was the exception and other teams were evaluating Favre on his senior season.
Actually, no. Wolf worked for Jets GM **** Steinburg in ’91 and the Jets didn’t have a first round pick in that draft. If they had a first rounder, Favre would have been a first round pick and Jets and Packers history would have been different. Wolf has said he had Favre rated as the top player in that draft and Steinburg was on board with that opinion enough to try to trade up in that draft to get Favre. In spite of those efforts the Jets were unable to move up. It looked as if Favre might fall to them at their #34 pick when Atlanta grabbed him at pick #33. The Jets settled for QB Browning Nagle with their pick.That's why Atalanta drafted him instead of Wolf I guess.
Ah, I see, Wolf wanted him for the Jets. If they got him instead of Atlanta then the Packers might have continued their wayward ways of the 70's and 80's.While there was some questioning of Thompson by fans I don’t think there was any chance Thompson’s job was in jeopardy last season even without the injuries. Add 15-16 players going to IR, including 6 starters and the chances of Murphy firing him were near zero IMO. Even without a playoff berth. Of course we'll never know and now Thompson will likely have his job as long as he wants it.
Actually, no. Wolf worked for Jets GM **** Steinburg in ’91 and the Jets didn’t have a first round pick in that draft. If they had a first rounder, Favre would have been a first round pick and Jets and Packers history would have been different. Wolf has said he had Favre rated as the top player in that draft and Steinburg was on board with that opinion enough to try to trade up in that draft to get Favre. In spite of those efforts the Jets were unable to move up. It looked as if Favre might fall to them at their #34 pick when Atlanta grabbed him at pick #33. The Jets settled for QB Browning Nagle with their pick.
Top 10 Draft "Busts" in Seattle Seahawks History: #1 - Dan McGwire - Field GullsApril 21, 1991 – (Seahawks) – Dan McGwire, 1st Round Draft Pick: 17 picks later, the Atlanta Falcons would select future Hall of Famer Brett Favre. Little known fact: Seahawks head coach Chuck Knox WANTED to draft Brett Favre. Unfortunately, the Seahawks brass couldn’t be bothered with such matters, instead finding McGwire’s 6 foot 8 inch frame to be simply irresistible. Our “Quarterback of the Future” ended his Seahawks career after the 1994 season having thrown for 745 yards in 12 games with 2 touchdowns and 6 interceptions.
With the 16th pick in the 1991 Draft, the Seattle Seahawks selected Dan McGwire, a QB out of San Diego State. He was a lesser known player and by the consensus at the time was a major reach at that pick. Rumor has it that the Hawks' ownership and coaching staff were at odds over the selection - but unfortunately for McGwire and Seahawks' fans alike, Ken Behring, the Seahawks' then owner, trumped all and took McGwire despite the scouts' and head coach Chuck Knox's furious cries of disagreement. (Knox and co were set on taking Brett Favvvvv...ra)
McGwire, who stands 6'8, was the tallest QB in the history of the NFL, but never showed promise in Seattle. His first several seasons he sat at 2nd or 3rd in the depth chart and when he did come in to play he was atrocious. After three years on the Seahawks' bench, McGwire's 'successor,' Rick Mirer, was drafted by the Seahawks to play QB, and McGwire was seemingly the forgotten man. However, Mirer was soon injured, forcing McGwire into action. He started three games, completing 48% of his passes while throwing 1 TD to 3 interceptions and being sacked 13 times. He was cut from the Seahawks after the '94 season and caught on with the Dolphins briefly but was out of the league after only playing in one game for Miami.
You must be logged in to see this image or video!
Despite being originally dubbed 'the quarterback of the future,' McGwire failed to develop into even a marginally effective quarterback after several years of being groomed on the bench and was finally released after four seasons for nothing in return.
Also, though many of the consequences of being drafted were out of McGwire's control, he unfortunately caused the rift between Ken Behring and Chuck Knox, ultimately leading to Knox's tenure with the Hawks coming to an end. The subsequent change of coaching staff marked the beginning of a downslide for the Hawks that lasted for seven years.
Not IMO. The turnaround started when Harlan took over and decided to hire a "football guy" to be in charge of all football decisions. It continued as Harlan made a great hire in Wolf and was cemented when Wolf picked Holmgren who put together a great staff. IMO the turnaround wasn't dependent upon any one player, including Favre.If they got him instead of Atlanta then the Packers might have continued their wayward ways of the 70's and 80's.
You must be logged in to see this image or video!
Clearly the Seahawks were impressed by his wicked mullet!
Not IMO. The turnaround started when Harlan took over and decided to hire a "football guy" to be in charge of all football decisions. It continued as Harlan made a great hire in Wolf and was cemented when Wolf picked Holmgren who put together a great staff. IMO the turnaround wasn't dependent upon any one player, including Favre.
That's true, and remember it took Reggie White to get this team a ring.Not IMO. The turnaround started when Harlan took over and decided to hire a "football guy" to be in charge of all football decisions. It continued as Harlan made a great hire in Wolf and was cemented when Wolf picked Holmgren who put together a great staff. IMO the turnaround wasn't dependent upon any one player, including Favre.