Facemask

Claymorespackersfan

Cheesehead
Joined
Dec 4, 2004
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Location
Stenhousemuir, Scotland
Was reading that the owners have agreed to nullify the 5-yard or incidental face-mask penalty. Does this mean that all face mask peanlties will be 15 yards from now on or that an incidental pull will carry no penalty?
 

PackFanWithTwins

Cheesehead
Joined
Jan 24, 2008
Messages
148
Reaction score
0
Location
Rothschild, WI
From the way I read it, The lesser penalty has been removed and the 15 yard is only for grabbing, twisting and such as before.

This would have saved Harris a few times last year. How many times did he get his hands knocked up during the bump.
 

ElleBlue

Cheesehead
Joined
Jan 18, 2008
Messages
447
Reaction score
0
This probably would have helped us win a few of those games when Harris kept getting penalized.
 

grabthar

Cheesehead
Joined
Mar 14, 2005
Messages
76
Reaction score
0
Location
Milwaukee, WI
If I recall correctly, Harris was mostly called to "Hands to the face" not incidental facemask. Those are 2 separate penalties. The hands to the face will still be called, just not the incidental facemask (the 5 yard variety).
 

trippster

Cheesehead
Joined
Dec 16, 2005
Messages
1,405
Reaction score
2
Location
Kenosha
I don't think that "hands to the face" is the same penalty as a 5 yard face mask. Harris is guilty of Hands ot the face.
 

djcubez

Cheesehead
Joined
Mar 23, 2008
Messages
141
Reaction score
0
Location
Milwaukee, WI
I like the rule change. Anybody know why the packers voted against the defensive headset change though? I heard it was because they were just unsure about all the technicalities and how it would implemented.
 
Joined
Jun 6, 2005
Messages
7,033
Reaction score
0
Location
Toronto, Canada
Anybody know why the packers voted against the defensive headset change though? I heard it was because they were just unsure about all the technicalities and how it would implemented.

Yup, that's what McCarthy said in a tidbit during the owners' meetings.

Apparently he just didn't feel the logistics of the idea were practical.
 

bozz_2006

Cheesehead
Joined
Mar 25, 2006
Messages
4,576
Reaction score
283
Location
Grand Forks, ND
it's not as cut and dried as the radios for QBs. The QB is always on the field. Who would wear it on the defense? it would have to be a number of different guys who alternate it. and each time a change is made, the player with the green dot has to check in with the ref. just gonna be kind of messy.
 

Veretax

Cheesehead
Joined
Feb 4, 2008
Messages
637
Reaction score
11
bozz_2006 said:
it's not as cut and dried as the radios for QBs. The QB is always on the field. Who would wear it on the defense? it would have to be a number of different guys who alternate it. and each time a change is made, the player with the green dot has to check in with the ref. just gonna be kind of messy.

Ump. They should check in with the Umpire. It makes no sense to do it to the Ref.
 

Members online

Latest posts

Top