Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 969929" data-attributes="member: 10086">The strategy was to invite the Bears to Run that clock and Run that clock they did. Do we want to give up big plays? Absolutely not and I never said that. I said anything under <5 yards inched us closer to a victory. Do we look at that film and make adjustments? Yes. Do we change our entire D game plan if it happens again? NopeWe had several poor tackles and really aside from that it accomplished what we intended. In addition, it was Matt himself that said Barry stuck to his game plan and he commended him for that specifically. Btw Eating clock??  isn’t some new philosophy that Oldschool thought sounded neat last week.We’d do the same thing under the same conditions and the only thing I’d change is the tackling needed to be better on several plays. I just don’t believe in playing “what ifs” in a game where we beat them by 3 scores!  It was a great Win and trying to say we almost lost because our Run D was atrocious is a bit far fetched. My take is had we played just a tad better? That score is 34-7. The Bears were lucky we gifted them a 56 yard record breaking FG on our Turnover. The Packers Defense near dominated the Bears all day, they were lucky to score 10 on a gift</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 1,079 (members: 0, guests: 1,079)