Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Heyjoe4" data-source="post: 953293" data-attributes="member: 13032">I agree Voyageur.  As hard as it may be for some people to believe, this may be a better team in the long run because of the trade and what it's allowing the Packers to do.  I'm not foolish and losing Adams is hard, but look at the Divisional loss to the Niners.  Rodgers only threw to Adams for 3 Qs.  That's nuts when the guy gets double teamed, even triple teamed and WE LOSE THE GAME!  Rodgers is going to have to throw the ball to guys before he completely trusts them.  He doesn't have the luxury of  waiting until they completely develop.  So iF he tHrows 10 or 12 pics instead of 4, is that bad?  We have to look at the other side and see if overall he's throwing for more yards, completion %, and TDs.Something tells me GB will be right up there contending for the NFC #1 seed again.  And even if that doesn't happen, they'll likely win the North and still be very competitive.</blockquote>

Total: 1,022 (members: 2, guests: 1,020)