Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Elgton Jenkins signs extension
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mondio" data-source="post: 983951" data-attributes="member: 10441"><p>I think it will limit itself to a degree. There are a few teams that seem to do well with lesser QB's. Most of them do not win the super bowl however. We can argue it didn't help GB by having one, and I'd agree. But by and large, excellent QB's are who end up on the winning team more often than not. I think that will continue. </p><p></p><p>the other part is, those teams that do, are stacked everywhere else. It works when you have very good players at every other position especially on defense. Build a team like that and they will have to be paid, but the problem is, those guys tend to miss more time than QB's it seems. Sure san fran can churn thru QB's, but lose Bosa and a linebacker and see where they go?</p><p></p><p>Nobody tilts a field like a great QB. The problem is many teams have been paying big bucks for mediocre QB's and in return has skyrocketed QB costs in general. I think the truly elite QB's will always get paid the big bucks because nobody tilts a field like they do. I think the middle of the road QB's will start to see teams saying, see ya, on big dollar contracts.</p><p>Someone mention Baltimore and Jackson. They could be doing just that. IMO, he's just a mediocre QB. Yeah he looks great on a team with a great defense and a pounding run game which he can operate behind. Take either away and he has to be a complete QB to tilt a field? I don't think he can do it and the exposure to injury if he has to will come back to bite a team paying him a lot of money. He's makes plenty of highlight reels, that's for sure. But that's because he does one thing really well with a game set up that way and that's it. I don't think that's winning over the long term.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mondio, post: 983951, member: 10441"] I think it will limit itself to a degree. There are a few teams that seem to do well with lesser QB's. Most of them do not win the super bowl however. We can argue it didn't help GB by having one, and I'd agree. But by and large, excellent QB's are who end up on the winning team more often than not. I think that will continue. the other part is, those teams that do, are stacked everywhere else. It works when you have very good players at every other position especially on defense. Build a team like that and they will have to be paid, but the problem is, those guys tend to miss more time than QB's it seems. Sure san fran can churn thru QB's, but lose Bosa and a linebacker and see where they go? Nobody tilts a field like a great QB. The problem is many teams have been paying big bucks for mediocre QB's and in return has skyrocketed QB costs in general. I think the truly elite QB's will always get paid the big bucks because nobody tilts a field like they do. I think the middle of the road QB's will start to see teams saying, see ya, on big dollar contracts. Someone mention Baltimore and Jackson. They could be doing just that. IMO, he's just a mediocre QB. Yeah he looks great on a team with a great defense and a pounding run game which he can operate behind. Take either away and he has to be a complete QB to tilt a field? I don't think he can do it and the exposure to injury if he has to will come back to bite a team paying him a lot of money. He's makes plenty of highlight reels, that's for sure. But that's because he does one thing really well with a game set up that way and that's it. I don't think that's winning over the long term. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
The Crew - 2026
Latest: weeds
Today at 5:19 AM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 11:12 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: tynimiller
Yesterday at 10:57 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Yesterday at 3:04 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Movies and TV shows Thread
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Yesterday at 2:00 PM
Movies and Entertainment
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Elgton Jenkins signs extension
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
