Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
EDIT!!!! FO WENT BOSS TODAY! $$$$$$$$$
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Do7" data-source="post: 823301" data-attributes="member: 13398"><p>I agree in your thoughts to Earl Thomas. Again he wouldn't be the top of my priority lists, but I'd sure as hell would be happy to have him. </p><p></p><p>As for Mack let me explain why I feel Mack could've been that missing piece. All of our losses this season with the exception of the Detroit game, was by two possession. I'd say all the games we've played we were well in, but with the combination of Rodgers and the offense not putting up points, and the injuries on the defensive side, something was gonna give. Most of these games we easily could've won. On the offensive side Rodgers is going to be our primary lead, while on the defensive side Mack could've been our driving force. Can you imagine how much he would've helped guys like Matthews, Daniels, Wilkerson, Martinez, Perry, etc in the pash rush? As a result this would've helped out the secondary with Alexander, and King (when he was healthy) as they easily would've gotten plenty ints due to the pressure the front was doing. The only thing we would've had to do was go cheap on safeties as we draft and develop one. And gradually plug in any other pieces for cheap in the meantime. I honestly believe if we had gotten Mack, we would've probably gone to the NFC championship if not the SB and dare I say beat Brady in both games. </p><p></p><p>And now it's like we're in a vicious cycle in which whoever we do pick up simply b/c they are good to very good, we should rejoice as if that's gonna get us over the hump. That's why I was willing to put up with AB, because his production of the field would've been worth the potential headaches. You gotta take the good with the bad. I'm not saying we go out and buy every FA out there, but freaking pick your spots, especially when it can strengthen you a great deal. AB would've buffered our WR corps, and we would've been arguably one of the best in the league. Now again if we trade of ODB then that will be fine as I prefer Odell over AB b/c he is younger and just as explosive, plus I'd think he'd get along better with the other receivers. Now that we saw what Oakland got for him we look like a pack of fools for not taking the opportunity. </p><p></p><p>Again I'd say we go after Miller.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Do7, post: 823301, member: 13398"] I agree in your thoughts to Earl Thomas. Again he wouldn't be the top of my priority lists, but I'd sure as hell would be happy to have him. As for Mack let me explain why I feel Mack could've been that missing piece. All of our losses this season with the exception of the Detroit game, was by two possession. I'd say all the games we've played we were well in, but with the combination of Rodgers and the offense not putting up points, and the injuries on the defensive side, something was gonna give. Most of these games we easily could've won. On the offensive side Rodgers is going to be our primary lead, while on the defensive side Mack could've been our driving force. Can you imagine how much he would've helped guys like Matthews, Daniels, Wilkerson, Martinez, Perry, etc in the pash rush? As a result this would've helped out the secondary with Alexander, and King (when he was healthy) as they easily would've gotten plenty ints due to the pressure the front was doing. The only thing we would've had to do was go cheap on safeties as we draft and develop one. And gradually plug in any other pieces for cheap in the meantime. I honestly believe if we had gotten Mack, we would've probably gone to the NFC championship if not the SB and dare I say beat Brady in both games. And now it's like we're in a vicious cycle in which whoever we do pick up simply b/c they are good to very good, we should rejoice as if that's gonna get us over the hump. That's why I was willing to put up with AB, because his production of the field would've been worth the potential headaches. You gotta take the good with the bad. I'm not saying we go out and buy every FA out there, but freaking pick your spots, especially when it can strengthen you a great deal. AB would've buffered our WR corps, and we would've been arguably one of the best in the league. Now again if we trade of ODB then that will be fine as I prefer Odell over AB b/c he is younger and just as explosive, plus I'd think he'd get along better with the other receivers. Now that we saw what Oakland got for him we look like a pack of fools for not taking the opportunity. Again I'd say we go after Miller. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
M
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Magooch
26 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Badgers Football 2025-2026
Latest: Voyageur
Today at 2:15 PM
Wisconsin Badgers Forum
Movies and TV shows Thread
Latest: Voyageur
Today at 1:29 PM
Movies and Entertainment
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: CarryTheG14
Today at 11:42 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 9:48 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
EDIT!!!! FO WENT BOSS TODAY! $$$$$$$$$
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top