Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="HardRightEdge" data-source="post: 832586">McCray was lauded for his serviceable performance as an emergency fill-in at OT.  And everybody likes a UDFA grinder story.  However, whether at OG or OT, his body of work has been just that--serviceable.He missed weeks 4 and 5 last season with a shoulder injury, Bell took over, and McCray didn't get his job back until Bell was injured mid-game in week 13.  If Bell were still around, a guy the Packers didn't think was worth keeping, McCray would be 3-deep at RG.If Taylor loses his job to Jenkins, which I believe is the default assumption at this point, it's worth considering he filled in at LT.  At this point, without McCray there are OT backup options with some combination of McCray, Spriggs or Turner moving over.The Packers did exercise the exclusive rights option on McCray at sub-$1 mil for one year with no guarantee, so he'll be in camp fighting for a job.  But he's squarely on the bubble.  His odds go up or down depending on whether the Packers keep 8 or 9 OL on the 53 man roster.</blockquote>

Total: 424 (members: 3, guests: 421)