Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Tactics (Needs vs trades)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 810494" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p style="margin-left: 20px">The one position I’m seeing many teams in front of us have a need for is at Edge. I don’t see more than 2-3 QBs at most before our pick. It’s very possible Edge is a position that is overemphasized to the point where a couple teams miss and get a Datone Jones type before we’re even on the clock.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">I would rather make a solid attempt to lock down at minimum 1 solid veteran Edge rusher in FA. I think this would take some of the pressure off us. It’s very possible (but unlikely with Gute) we could stand pat altogether and lock a a top tier Offensive player. That would allow us to use our resources and package #32 (I think this will change for the better slightly when all is said and done)with our 3rd round draft pick in order to move into the early 20s overall for our second overall draft pick. I’d use that on a second pass rusher if possible.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">Another idea I’d like to see us implement would be to double down at 2 of these 3 positions (Edge, S and OL) with 1 stellar FA each combined with a 1st round draft pairing.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">My personal choice would be an OT and OG, then two at the Edge position. I’d do it early and make it entirely evident that we are 100% prepared to walk away from Clay Mathews unless he takes a substantial paycut and is flexible in moving positions if needed</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">Finally, I’d hit the 3rd position in that grouping in the draft with 2 players by #111 (such as 1-second rounder and 1-4th rounder) and I wouldn’t be adverse to packaging a couple of</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">mid /late rounders to move up the ladder if the right fit is there in either case.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">We could even hit all 3 Positions once apiece in FA first with a starter caliber player.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 810494, member: 10086"] [INDENT]The one position I’m seeing many teams in front of us have a need for is at Edge. I don’t see more than 2-3 QBs at most before our pick. It’s very possible Edge is a position that is overemphasized to the point where a couple teams miss and get a Datone Jones type before we’re even on the clock. I would rather make a solid attempt to lock down at minimum 1 solid veteran Edge rusher in FA. I think this would take some of the pressure off us. It’s very possible (but unlikely with Gute) we could stand pat altogether and lock a a top tier Offensive player. That would allow us to use our resources and package #32 (I think this will change for the better slightly when all is said and done)with our 3rd round draft pick in order to move into the early 20s overall for our second overall draft pick. I’d use that on a second pass rusher if possible. Another idea I’d like to see us implement would be to double down at 2 of these 3 positions (Edge, S and OL) with 1 stellar FA each combined with a 1st round draft pairing. My personal choice would be an OT and OG, then two at the Edge position. I’d do it early and make it entirely evident that we are 100% prepared to walk away from Clay Mathews unless he takes a substantial paycut and is flexible in moving positions if needed Finally, I’d hit the 3rd position in that grouping in the draft with 2 players by #111 (such as 1-second rounder and 1-4th rounder) and I wouldn’t be adverse to packaging a couple of mid /late rounders to move up the ladder if the right fit is there in either case. We could even hit all 3 Positions once apiece in FA first with a starter caliber player.[/INDENT] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: milani
Today at 5:13 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 12:42 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 11:14 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 10:32 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Off Season News
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 2:18 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Tactics (Needs vs trades)
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
