Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Sunshinepacker" data-source="post: 810486" data-attributes="member: 9033"><p>Taking the best player available is always the best strategy, so long as one player is clearly ahead of another. Barring that, I have no problem saying that certain players are all on a tier and then prioritizing certain positions ahead of those. If, say, the front office has an edge rusher ranked in the same tier as an OG, even if the OG is slightly better in their eyes, I would prefer they take the edge rusher. Certain positions are just more valuable and the payoff to getting a great edge rusher is far larger vs getting a great guard. Edge rusher is the closest thing for a defense to a QB; a QB makes the entire offense better, while the effect isn't as large for an edge rusher, they're the only position on a defense that can approximate that effect. Mind you, I'm excluding generational guys like Revis or Earl Thomas that allow a DC to build entire defenses around because I'm not sure any team should "plan" on getting guys like that.</p></blockquote><p></p>

No members online now.

Total: 1,050 (members: 0, guests: 1,050)