Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="thequick12" data-source="post: 826681" data-attributes="member: 9797">The Flacco thing is the same as Keenum.  They are not "the guy" they are a stop gap so you can get your future frachise guy up to speed without just throwing him into the fire.  I believe it's called "the Aaron Rodgers method.". I think both Washington and Denver will be after a QB in this draft.  Now will they take one in the first to get one of the top three or do they trade back into the first and try to get a Daniel Jones at the bottom of the first or maybe top of the second.  Or a will Grier in the third etc.Also the Vikings team keenum took to the nfccg was infinitly more talented than the one he will have in Washington.  I don't think there's a comparison to be made there.  The Vikings had an elite defense and 2 of the top 10/15 wrs in the NFL.   Washington has nothing close to that.As for trading Graham, I didn't write the article.  But surely the salary cap savings of only 300k wouldn't be a deal breaker.  Picking up a extra pick in the top 100 for an underachieving veteran who is probably not in your plans after this season seems to be a great deal to me.   I'd actually be more surprised if the Patriots offered a 3rd for him although I think they do have a few of them</blockquote>

Total: 649 (members: 1, guests: 648)