Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Dr. Z Sports Illustrated picks Vikes for Super Bowl
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DoddPower" data-source="post: 229371" data-attributes="member: 809"><p>I don't agree with that entirely. If a team has a good (but maybe not great) run defense and a POOR secondary, it only makes sense to attack one's weakness as opposed to their strength. Mike McCarthy did a great job of that for most the season. </p><p></p><p>Basically what I'm saying is perhaps their number 1 rated run defense stat is somewhat inflated. As I said, I don't have the stats in front of me, but any stat like that is relative, which must be kept in mind. If a team game plans to pass the ball 80% of the time because they are certain it will work, then of course less rushing yards will be gained. </p><p></p><p>I'm not saying the Vikings run defense isn't really good, because I know better. However, I'm just saying that it's interesting to ponder. Maybe one of the knowledgeable stat guys on here can find the stats to compare and discuss? I'm interested at least.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DoddPower, post: 229371, member: 809"] I don't agree with that entirely. If a team has a good (but maybe not great) run defense and a POOR secondary, it only makes sense to attack one's weakness as opposed to their strength. Mike McCarthy did a great job of that for most the season. Basically what I'm saying is perhaps their number 1 rated run defense stat is somewhat inflated. As I said, I don't have the stats in front of me, but any stat like that is relative, which must be kept in mind. If a team game plans to pass the ball 80% of the time because they are certain it will work, then of course less rushing yards will be gained. I'm not saying the Vikings run defense isn't really good, because I know better. However, I'm just saying that it's interesting to ponder. Maybe one of the knowledgeable stat guys on here can find the stats to compare and discuss? I'm interested at least. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Staff online
PikeBadger
Moderator
Members online
PikeBadger
Krabs
Dukefan12
Latest posts
The 11th Annual Amish Draft Contest 2024
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
20 minutes ago
Draft Talk
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: Krabs
25 minutes ago
Draft Talk
M
Not too soon 2024 roster prediction
Latest: mradtke66
40 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 2nd Rd pick #58 Javon Bullard S
Latest: Sanguine camper
46 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
G
I had This Nightmare
Latest: GleefulGary
52 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Dr. Z Sports Illustrated picks Vikes for Super Bowl
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top