Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Dougherty: Packers won't rush KGB decision
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Greg C." data-source="post: 129797" data-attributes="member: 195"><p>Here's an article about KGB from today's Press Gazette:</p><p></p><p>Posted January 12, 2007</p><p></p><p>Packers won't rush KGB decision </p><p></p><p>By Pete Dougherty </p><p><a href="mailto:pdougher@greenbaypressgazette.com">pdougher@greenbaypressgazette.com</a> </p><p></p><p>Among the many decisions General Manager Ted Thompson has to make this offseason is what to do with pass rusher Kabeer Gbaja-Biamila. </p><p></p><p>In the last month of the season, Cullen Jenkins took over for Gbaja-Biamila as the starting right defensive end and profoundly improved the Packers' run defense. Assuming the Packers retain Jenkins as a restricted free agent, Thompson will have to decide whether Gbaja-Biamila will be worth his $5 million salary in 2007 playing mainly as a pass-rush specialist rather than as an every-down player. </p><p></p><p>Though it's too early in the offseason to draw definite conclusions, there's reason to think the Packers seriously are considering keeping Gbaja-Biamila at that salary rather than asking him to take a pay cut. A proven rusher such as Gbaja-Biamila, 29, could make at least $5 million in a signing bonus alone if he refused the cut and was released, even though his sack production has declined the last two years. </p><p></p><p>"I think that's fair to say," said Bruce Tollner, Gbaja-Biamila's agent, of his client's worth on the open market. </p><p></p><p>Tollner said the Packers have not called to discuss Gbaja-Biamila's salary and a possible pay cut. There's plenty of time to address that if Thompson chooses — free agency and the new NFL year don't begin until March 2 — but those are issues the team often begins exploring early in the offseason. </p><p></p><p>"I have not talked to the team with regard to that," Tollner said, "and I'd rather not get into my speculations on what they're going to do." </p><p></p><p>The Packers are believed to be close to $25 million under the 2007 cap, so they have no compelling reason to clear cap room immediately other than to maintain their salary structure. They conceivably could carry Gbaja-Biamila's $5 million on their cap well into the offseason and see how a young pass rusher such as Jason Hunter develops and whether they land a comparable rusher at a cheaper price in free agency, or draft a prospect they especially like. </p><p></p><p>However, with the salary cap going up an estimated $7 million this year to $109 million, most teams have substantial cap room, and salaries will continue to escalate. By the end of the first wave of free agency in mid-March, $5 million for a valuable commodity such as a pass-rush specialist might be high, but not outrageous, if they think Gbaja-Biamila's production will rebound if he's playing less and thus fresher when he's on the field. </p><p></p><p>Gbaja-Biamila tied his career high for sacks with 13½ in 2004, but dropped to eight sacks in 16 games in 2005 and six sacks in 15 games this season. There's thought that as Gbaja-Biamila gets older, his effectiveness as a pass rusher, especially in the fourth quarter, will improve with Jenkins replacing him on most run downs. </p><p></p><p></p><p>My own two cents: I would like to keep KGB, even at his current salary. With the cap increasing, I think if the Packers ask him to take a pay cut he will go somewhere else and earn about the same amount of money as he would with his current contract. KGB actually played the run very well for the first half of the season but then wore down. Jenkins would've been brought in earlier if he hadn't been hurt. I think Kampman benefitted a lot, especially earlier in the season, by KGB's presence on the other side. Also, Kampman wore down a bit at the end because he hardly ever got a breather. </p><p></p><p>I would love to see a Kampman/Jenkins/KGB rotation at DE next season. Why not? Having three DE's who are legitimate pass-rushing threats is like having a really good third CB, or like having three good wide receivers on offense. It's maybe even more important, because you need to rotate those guys for maximum effectiveness.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Greg C., post: 129797, member: 195"] Here's an article about KGB from today's Press Gazette: Posted January 12, 2007 Packers won't rush KGB decision By Pete Dougherty [email]pdougher@greenbaypressgazette.com[/email] Among the many decisions General Manager Ted Thompson has to make this offseason is what to do with pass rusher Kabeer Gbaja-Biamila. In the last month of the season, Cullen Jenkins took over for Gbaja-Biamila as the starting right defensive end and profoundly improved the Packers' run defense. Assuming the Packers retain Jenkins as a restricted free agent, Thompson will have to decide whether Gbaja-Biamila will be worth his $5 million salary in 2007 playing mainly as a pass-rush specialist rather than as an every-down player. Though it's too early in the offseason to draw definite conclusions, there's reason to think the Packers seriously are considering keeping Gbaja-Biamila at that salary rather than asking him to take a pay cut. A proven rusher such as Gbaja-Biamila, 29, could make at least $5 million in a signing bonus alone if he refused the cut and was released, even though his sack production has declined the last two years. "I think that's fair to say," said Bruce Tollner, Gbaja-Biamila's agent, of his client's worth on the open market. Tollner said the Packers have not called to discuss Gbaja-Biamila's salary and a possible pay cut. There's plenty of time to address that if Thompson chooses — free agency and the new NFL year don't begin until March 2 — but those are issues the team often begins exploring early in the offseason. "I have not talked to the team with regard to that," Tollner said, "and I'd rather not get into my speculations on what they're going to do." The Packers are believed to be close to $25 million under the 2007 cap, so they have no compelling reason to clear cap room immediately other than to maintain their salary structure. They conceivably could carry Gbaja-Biamila's $5 million on their cap well into the offseason and see how a young pass rusher such as Jason Hunter develops and whether they land a comparable rusher at a cheaper price in free agency, or draft a prospect they especially like. However, with the salary cap going up an estimated $7 million this year to $109 million, most teams have substantial cap room, and salaries will continue to escalate. By the end of the first wave of free agency in mid-March, $5 million for a valuable commodity such as a pass-rush specialist might be high, but not outrageous, if they think Gbaja-Biamila's production will rebound if he's playing less and thus fresher when he's on the field. Gbaja-Biamila tied his career high for sacks with 13½ in 2004, but dropped to eight sacks in 16 games in 2005 and six sacks in 15 games this season. There's thought that as Gbaja-Biamila gets older, his effectiveness as a pass rusher, especially in the fourth quarter, will improve with Jenkins replacing him on most run downs. My own two cents: I would like to keep KGB, even at his current salary. With the cap increasing, I think if the Packers ask him to take a pay cut he will go somewhere else and earn about the same amount of money as he would with his current contract. KGB actually played the run very well for the first half of the season but then wore down. Jenkins would've been brought in earlier if he hadn't been hurt. I think Kampman benefitted a lot, especially earlier in the season, by KGB's presence on the other side. Also, Kampman wore down a bit at the end because he hardly ever got a breather. I would love to see a Kampman/Jenkins/KGB rotation at DE next season. Why not? Having three DE's who are legitimate pass-rushing threats is like having a really good third CB, or like having three good wide receivers on offense. It's maybe even more important, because you need to rotate those guys for maximum effectiveness. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
ExpatPacker
Latest posts
Prospects you are A LOT higher on than consensus…
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 1:19 AM
Draft Talk
2024 Draft Prospect Discussions
Latest: DoURant
Yesterday at 10:20 PM
Draft Talk
The 11th Annual Amish Draft Contest 2024
Latest: PackFan2
Yesterday at 8:28 PM
Draft Talk
Anyone watching the UFL?
Latest: Voyageur
Yesterday at 4:49 PM
Fantasy Football
The Packers All-Personality Team
Latest: Thirteen Below
Yesterday at 4:37 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Dougherty: Packers won't rush KGB decision
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top