Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Do we really need a OG/OT when we have Marshall Newhouse?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TJV" data-source="post: 365883" data-attributes="member: 4300"><p><strong>"Do we really need a OG/OT when we have Marshall Newhouse?"</strong> </p><p> </p><p>IMO yes. Newhouse looked OK in the limited time we saw him in pre season and the staff is high on him. But there was a reason he was a fifth round draft pick who was inactive for every game until he went on IR in December. </p><p> </p><p>I think Lang is more of a sure thing than Newhouse and even Lang isn't a <strong>sure</strong> thing. I think Bulaga is more of a sure thing at LT than Lang is at LG, and IMO even Bulaga isn't a <strong>sure</strong> thing at LT. I hope and expect the Packers will select two OL in this draft. Not necessarily in the first round but I hope early and I hope the early one is an OT, not G/T. Versatility is great but look at Clifton - if he can "only" play LT, who cares? Much better to have rookie who can be great at OT instead of one who can be pretty good at OG, OT or OC. To get one of those guys probably means picking him early.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TJV, post: 365883, member: 4300"] [B]"Do we really need a OG/OT when we have Marshall Newhouse?"[/B] IMO yes. Newhouse looked OK in the limited time we saw him in pre season and the staff is high on him. But there was a reason he was a fifth round draft pick who was inactive for every game until he went on IR in December. I think Lang is more of a sure thing than Newhouse and even Lang isn't a [B]sure[/B] thing. I think Bulaga is more of a sure thing at LT than Lang is at LG, and IMO even Bulaga isn't a [B]sure[/B] thing at LT. I hope and expect the Packers will select two OL in this draft. Not necessarily in the first round but I hope early and I hope the early one is an OT, not G/T. Versatility is great but look at Clifton - if he can "only" play LT, who cares? Much better to have rookie who can be great at OT instead of one who can be pretty good at OG, OT or OC. To get one of those guys probably means picking him early. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Pkrjones
gopkrs
Latest posts
H
Early 53 Man Roster Projection
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 2:20 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
Final Thoughts on 2025 Draft
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 2:19 PM
Draft Talk
2025 NFL Schedule Release
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 1:35 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2025 Draft in Green Bay
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 1:35 PM
Draft Talk
Isaiah Simmons is COMING
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 1:27 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Do we really need a OG/OT when we have Marshall Newhouse?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top