Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
Do We REALLY NEED a CB THAT BBADLY?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TJV" data-source="post: 442444" data-attributes="member: 4300"><p><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'">60six, I don't think there will be a CB at #28 that would represent value at that spot. But I've been surprised so many times by Thompson I just don't know how he and his staff differ from the "experts". For example, if I remember correctly the experts had Nick Collins graded as a 3rd or 4th rounder - perhaps because most saw him as a CB. </span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'">HyponGrey, in order:</span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'">Fair enough.</span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'">That Lee is no longer a Packer was my point. Hard to count on House as a 4th rounder who we saw almost nothing from when a 2nd rounder washed out IMO except for STs where he was getting better as a gunner. </span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'">LOL. But I've gotta ask: If every mock drafter was trading up into the third round for a punter, would you??!! <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/wink.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-shortname=";)" /> </span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'">Yep.</span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'">No apology necessary. By internet board standards I think this is pretty tame stuff. </span></p><p> </p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TJV, post: 442444, member: 4300"] [FONT=Tahoma]60six, I don't think there will be a CB at #28 that would represent value at that spot. But I've been surprised so many times by Thompson I just don't know how he and his staff differ from the "experts". For example, if I remember correctly the experts had Nick Collins graded as a 3rd or 4th rounder - perhaps because most saw him as a CB. [/FONT] [FONT=Tahoma]HyponGrey, in order:[/FONT] [FONT=Tahoma]Fair enough.[/FONT] [FONT=Tahoma]That Lee is no longer a Packer was my point. Hard to count on House as a 4th rounder who we saw almost nothing from when a 2nd rounder washed out IMO except for STs where he was getting better as a gunner. [/FONT] [FONT=Tahoma]LOL. But I've gotta ask: If every mock drafter was trading up into the third round for a punter, would you??!! ;) [/FONT] [FONT=Tahoma]Yep.[/FONT] [FONT=Tahoma]No apology necessary. By internet board standards I think this is pretty tame stuff. [/FONT] [FONT=Tahoma] [/FONT] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
milani
Latest posts
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: milani
7 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Cap Projections and changes
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 11:26 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Movies and TV shows Thread
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 11:24 PM
Movies and Entertainment
M
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: Magooch
Yesterday at 3:46 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
M
2026 Draft Rd 6 #35 K Trey Smack Florida
Latest: mradtke66
Yesterday at 2:31 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
Do We REALLY NEED a CB THAT BBADLY?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top