Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Do the packers have the best WR core in the league?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ivo610" data-source="post: 502388" data-attributes="member: 2128"><p>I like to point out the obvious, sorry, its clearly a sore subject for you.</p><p> </p><p>Jones lead the league in TDs last season. Nelson had 15 the year before. Cobb set the single season yardage record for the packers and didnt play even that many snaps last season. So lets discuss who you think stacks up against that... (the claim that some of these teams are even in the convo is ludicrous)</p><p> </p><p>Seattle? Harvin is legit. Great player. Coming into a system that doesnt know him but he is on par with Cobb, a threat all over the field that may set a single season record for Seattle. </p><p> </p><p>Sidney rice and Jones? ok lets talk about that. Last season Jones had 14 more receptions, 36 more yards, and twice as many TDs. So they are the same to you? HAHAHAHAHAHA keep trolling.</p><p> </p><p>Golden Tate and Nelson? Even more humorous. Tate played in 3 more games and started 5 more last season. For all that extra time on the field, Tate 4 less receptions, 57 less yards, and the same amount of TDs. So please, make a solid argument for Seattle being better. Please. If you do that I will continue on to the next team.</p><p> </p><p>I just sonned you.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ivo610, post: 502388, member: 2128"] I like to point out the obvious, sorry, its clearly a sore subject for you. Jones lead the league in TDs last season. Nelson had 15 the year before. Cobb set the single season yardage record for the packers and didnt play even that many snaps last season. So lets discuss who you think stacks up against that... (the claim that some of these teams are even in the convo is ludicrous) Seattle? Harvin is legit. Great player. Coming into a system that doesnt know him but he is on par with Cobb, a threat all over the field that may set a single season record for Seattle. Sidney rice and Jones? ok lets talk about that. Last season Jones had 14 more receptions, 36 more yards, and twice as many TDs. So they are the same to you? HAHAHAHAHAHA keep trolling. Golden Tate and Nelson? Even more humorous. Tate played in 3 more games and started 5 more last season. For all that extra time on the field, Tate 4 less receptions, 57 less yards, and the same amount of TDs. So please, make a solid argument for Seattle being better. Please. If you do that I will continue on to the next team. I just sonned you. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Capitol 8805
El Guapo
pacmaniac
GBkrzygrl
Latest posts
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: tynimiller
22 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
R
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: rmontro
38 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: tynimiller
54 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
R
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: rmontro
Today at 8:27 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: Half Empty
Today at 8:19 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Do the packers have the best WR core in the league?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top