Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Dez or Brian?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="adambr2" data-source="post: 614629" data-attributes="member: 7277"><p>While you can certainly argue that perhaps the Packers don't win the Super Bowl without Bulaga, as Sunshinepacker pointed out Bulaga was not especially good that year. So it's far more likely that whoever replaced Bulaga that year could have done as well, or at least well enough to not be the difference in costing us the Super Bowl.</p><p></p><p>You could also argue that perhaps the Packers win Super Bowl 49 with Bryant, maybe no one not even Seattle stops our passing attack in the playoffs and we go on to beat New England. Or perhaps without Bulaga our O-line gives us problems and we don't even get to Seattle.,</p><p></p><p>You also have to consider whether we keep Nelson and even Cobb if we had Bryant. It's possible we'd be without either. Keep in mind that Bryant is discussing holding out this year, so we'd be dealing with that as well (if we didn't sign or franchise him ).</p><p></p><p>Really there's a million ways you could go with it with a million different possibilities. I would say talent and value wise that Bryant is certainly the better player, while at the same time I'm happy with the way things worked out and wouldn't change it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="adambr2, post: 614629, member: 7277"] While you can certainly argue that perhaps the Packers don't win the Super Bowl without Bulaga, as Sunshinepacker pointed out Bulaga was not especially good that year. So it's far more likely that whoever replaced Bulaga that year could have done as well, or at least well enough to not be the difference in costing us the Super Bowl. You could also argue that perhaps the Packers win Super Bowl 49 with Bryant, maybe no one not even Seattle stops our passing attack in the playoffs and we go on to beat New England. Or perhaps without Bulaga our O-line gives us problems and we don't even get to Seattle., You also have to consider whether we keep Nelson and even Cobb if we had Bryant. It's possible we'd be without either. Keep in mind that Bryant is discussing holding out this year, so we'd be dealing with that as well (if we didn't sign or franchise him ). Really there's a million ways you could go with it with a million different possibilities. I would say talent and value wise that Bryant is certainly the better player, while at the same time I'm happy with the way things worked out and wouldn't change it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Heyjoe4
Matt39
ThePerfectBeard
shockerx
Latest posts
H
2024 3rd round #88 MarShawn Lloyd RB
Latest: Heyjoe4
A moment ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
162-0
Latest: weeds
15 minutes ago
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Green Bay to Host '25 Draft!
Latest: weeds
21 minutes ago
NFL Discussions
S
2024 Packer UDFA Tracker....
Latest: Schultz
Today at 5:55 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 12:58 AM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Dez or Brian?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top