Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Dez or Brian?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sunshinepacker" data-source="post: 614443" data-attributes="member: 9033"><p>This all hypothetical anyway but I struggle to find many examples of a team with a terrific QB winning the Super Bowl that also had a dominant oline. It's also not a question of just saying Cobb & Bulaga over Bryant and a random RT. If the Packers have Bryant then they probably don't feel the pressure to draft a WR in the second round last year (though they still might). If you're looking at this as the post started, Bryant or Bulaga, then you just need to look at it from a talent standpoint. Why is best player available the desired strategy in the draft and yet this question (which is about the draft) suddenly involves fit?</p><p></p><p>How different might 2013 have been if the Packer's backup QBs had Bryant and Nelson to chuck the ball up to (I mean, Bulaga didn't have any impact that year)? It's the NFL, guys get hurt. Dez Bryant is the better player at a more important position than Bulaga. While some Packers fans won't admit it, there's a REASON that Dez will get paid A LOT more money than any right tackle in the NFL and more money than pretty much any other WR. If Bryant isn't the better player, then why would any team spend more money on him?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sunshinepacker, post: 614443, member: 9033"] This all hypothetical anyway but I struggle to find many examples of a team with a terrific QB winning the Super Bowl that also had a dominant oline. It's also not a question of just saying Cobb & Bulaga over Bryant and a random RT. If the Packers have Bryant then they probably don't feel the pressure to draft a WR in the second round last year (though they still might). If you're looking at this as the post started, Bryant or Bulaga, then you just need to look at it from a talent standpoint. Why is best player available the desired strategy in the draft and yet this question (which is about the draft) suddenly involves fit? How different might 2013 have been if the Packer's backup QBs had Bryant and Nelson to chuck the ball up to (I mean, Bulaga didn't have any impact that year)? It's the NFL, guys get hurt. Dez Bryant is the better player at a more important position than Bulaga. While some Packers fans won't admit it, there's a REASON that Dez will get paid A LOT more money than any right tackle in the NFL and more money than pretty much any other WR. If Bryant isn't the better player, then why would any team spend more money on him? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Calebs Revenge
El Guapo
Green_Bay_Packers
Latest posts
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: Thirteen Below
8 minutes ago
Draft Talk
Bucks v. Pacers
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
46 minutes ago
Milwaukee Bucks Forum
Who Will Start?
Latest: Poppa San
Today at 1:16 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
29th pick.. Eric stokes db
Latest: tynimiller
Today at 12:42 PM
Draft Talk
The Jordan Love Era Begins
Latest: tynimiller
Today at 11:42 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Dez or Brian?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top