Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Defense under Barry
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mradtke66" data-source="post: 942820" data-attributes="member: 4199"><p>The problem with that being a 4-3/3-4 argument is we're into nickel defense now. A 6 man front is nickel, which is typically dictated by down and distance and/or offensive personnel.</p><p></p><p>If the offense comes out with 3 WRs, I want 3 CBs out there, period. </p><p></p><p>This is a common, modern approach. (Though not that modern. we did the same thing when I was in high school 20+ years ago.) Come out in a pass set, force the defense to defend the pass. And then run the ball. If they do not defend the pass by alignment and/or personnel shifts, take the easy 5 yard completions until they do.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>But now you're talking about backend coverage. You can play soft or tight in either scheme. You can play man, cover 1, cover 2, cover 3, quarters from any front.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>For short yardage, I have no objection on going with a 5-6 man line. There is certainly some risk to it, but yes, it should cover up the easy yards on the ground.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mradtke66, post: 942820, member: 4199"] The problem with that being a 4-3/3-4 argument is we're into nickel defense now. A 6 man front is nickel, which is typically dictated by down and distance and/or offensive personnel. If the offense comes out with 3 WRs, I want 3 CBs out there, period. This is a common, modern approach. (Though not that modern. we did the same thing when I was in high school 20+ years ago.) Come out in a pass set, force the defense to defend the pass. And then run the ball. If they do not defend the pass by alignment and/or personnel shifts, take the easy 5 yard completions until they do. But now you're talking about backend coverage. You can play soft or tight in either scheme. You can play man, cover 1, cover 2, cover 3, quarters from any front. For short yardage, I have no objection on going with a 5-6 man line. There is certainly some risk to it, but yes, it should cover up the easy yards on the ground. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Firethorn1001
Latest posts
Rodgers for Vice President?
Latest: Thirteen Below
3 minutes ago
Aaron Rodgers Discusson
Final Annoying Mock/Prediction
Latest: Poppa San
Today at 6:46 PM
Draft Talk
Prospects you are A LOT higher on than consensus…
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 6:44 PM
Draft Talk
Free Agency Thread
Latest: Sanguine camper
Today at 5:26 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Backed Into A Corner?
Latest: Pkrjones
Today at 5:21 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Defense under Barry
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top