Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Defense being tired
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sunshinepacker" data-source="post: 677012" data-attributes="member: 9033"><p>The Packers gave up six points in the second half. If people are unhappy with that, then it might be unrealistic expectations.</p><p></p><p>The offense was not explosive against the Jags. The first TD was a product of the "underwhelming" defense forcing a turnover and giving the offense a short field. The two TD drives at the end of the first half were great. 9 plays and 5 plays to cover 75 yards each time. The second half is where things fell apart; two drives ended in FGs and took 13 and 16 plays each to cover about 70 yards. No offense in the NFL will consistently be good if it takes that many plays to cover that amount of yardage. So, yeah, the offense was not very explosive and there is no argument that can make Rodgers' yards per attempt look respectable.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sunshinepacker, post: 677012, member: 9033"] The Packers gave up six points in the second half. If people are unhappy with that, then it might be unrealistic expectations. The offense was not explosive against the Jags. The first TD was a product of the "underwhelming" defense forcing a turnover and giving the offense a short field. The two TD drives at the end of the first half were great. 9 plays and 5 plays to cover 75 yards each time. The second half is where things fell apart; two drives ended in FGs and took 13 and 16 plays each to cover about 70 yards. No offense in the NFL will consistently be good if it takes that many plays to cover that amount of yardage. So, yeah, the offense was not very explosive and there is no argument that can make Rodgers' yards per attempt look respectable. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Heyjoe4
shockerx
Latest posts
Pre Look WR Predictions
Latest: OldSchool101
5 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
First Round Pick #23 - Matthew Golden WR - Texas
Latest: OldSchool101
12 minutes ago
Draft Talk
H
State of our former QB, Aaron Rodgers
Latest: Heyjoe4
23 minutes ago
Aaron Rodgers Discusson
P
Sean Rhyan missed out on $2 mil bonus by 3 snaps
Latest: PackerDNA
52 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
Is it time?
Latest: Heyjoe4
57 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Defense being tired
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top