1. Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!

    Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers. You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user.

    Sign Up or

    Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions. Furthermore, we hide most of the ads once you register as a member!
    Dismiss Notice

defence

Discussion in 'Packer Fan Forum' started by nleidigh319, Oct 30, 2007.

  1. nleidigh319

    nleidigh319 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2007
    Messages:
    68
    Ratings:
    +0
    what type of defence should the packers run? i think they should run an aggressive blitzing defence. or a tampa 2. we definatly need to give the corners help
     
  2. brennan1884

    brennan1884 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2007
    Messages:
    841
    Ratings:
    +0
    do you mean for this upcoming game or just in general for all games.

    id say were running the right defense right now to be quite honest. We play bump and run week in and week out becuase we have SHUT DOWN CORNERS!!!!

    and then up front we run the 4-3 with kampman and now KGB( as you may have noticed hes getting alot more reps with Jenkins mystery injury)


    and our linebackers come with blitz packages.

    id like to see some safety blitzes to mix things up
     
  3. nleidigh319

    nleidigh319 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2007
    Messages:
    68
    Ratings:
    +0
    "and our linebackers come with blitz packages. id like to see some safety blitzes to mix things up" thats what i meant by agressive blitzing lol
     
  4. TOPackerFan

    TOPackerFan Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2004
    Messages:
    2,084
    Ratings:
    +0
    Blitzing is high risk, high reward. We may get some turnovers, but most big plays in the NFL come against a big blitz.

    We don't have the personnel to play Tampa 2 (Harris and Woodson don't play well off the line). Our personnel is tailor made for the Bates scheme we're running, so I'd stick with what we're doing (remember that the Bears and Chargers games were the only ones where we gave up more than 20 points.
     
  5. brennan1884

    brennan1884 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2007
    Messages:
    841
    Ratings:
    +0
    excellent point about the points, that should be the mark of a defense instead of yards
     
  6. nleidigh319

    nleidigh319 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2007
    Messages:
    68
    Ratings:
    +0
    ya i agree you can allow 300 yard and 0 points and you will win (or tie lol) the game
     
  7. de_real_deal

    de_real_deal Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2007
    Messages:
    591
    Ratings:
    +0
    What is defence?
     
  8. brennan1884

    brennan1884 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2007
    Messages:
    841
    Ratings:
    +0
    its defense spelled by a 6 year old
     
  9. nleidigh319

    nleidigh319 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2007
    Messages:
    68
    Ratings:
    +0
    my bad just a typo
     
  10. Greg C.

    Greg C. Cheesehead

    Joined:
    May 31, 2005
    Messages:
    2,856
    Ratings:
    +0
    It's the British (or Canadian) spelling of defense.
     
  11. Cory

    Cory Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2006
    Messages:
    959
    Ratings:
    +0
    Don't have the personel for the Tampa 2, but if we did and switched to that D we would see ALOT of big plays out of Hawk. His skills are more suited for that D.
     
  12. nleidigh319

    nleidigh319 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2007
    Messages:
    68
    Ratings:
    +0
    ya and woodson and harris are good at pressing whitch is what i was thinking about mainly during that thought process
     
  13. Cory

    Cory Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2006
    Messages:
    959
    Ratings:
    +0
    Yeah haha I remember reading Harris kind of critisizing the Tampa 2 corners that sit in a zone and collect ints on their way to the pro bowl yet Harris and Wood do the real work.
     

Share This Page