Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 908907" data-attributes="member: 10086">That’s an intriguing yet rhetorical statement. I had to seriously consider that and it had me all over the map.  That generic statement can mean a multitude of completely different opinions depending on how you perceive it.It can imply you don’t think we’ve been helping our team get the right guys and so your saying you’d like to get the right guys. Kind of the angle of slighting the decision makers. ANTI- DECISION MAKERORYou don’t care what the method is of getting there as long as we pick players that help in the long run  (“the end justifies the means” type argument).PRO DECISION MAKERORyoure just kind of happy go lucky and you just want players that help the team, but it does not necessarily bother you if they are worse or better than a consensus best available player at that given opportunity. Kind of indifferent in nature so to speak and if we pick someone who helps (which most do) you’re not going to get critical or conversely, you’re not going to necessarily praise a player etc.. you  just like ones who help. NEUTRALIt reminds me of one of those paintings that you can see multiple things depending on how you look at it. Very Bill Clinton esc. “It depends what the definition of is ..is?” Im not sure how you could disagree or agree without more information actually.</blockquote>

Total: 606 (members: 3, guests: 603)