Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
[DEBATE] Staff
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pyledriver80" data-source="post: 94338" data-attributes="member: 194"><p><strong>Re: [DEBATE] Thompson Vs ... (Overall impressions of TT/MM/etc.)</strong></p><p></p><p>But why is it so young? We were not exactly an Old team in 2004.</p><p></p><p>I'm talking personel wise</p><p></p><p>Walker </p><p>Wahle</p><p>Rivera</p><p>Chatman</p><p>Fisher</p><p>Roman</p><p>Carroll</p><p>Lenon</p><p>Sharper</p><p>Hawthorne</p><p>Thomas </p><p>Navies </p><p>Peterson</p><p>Jackson</p><p>Diggs</p><p>Davenport</p><p>Leach</p><p>Longwell</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Now you lose all these guys who won the division title and replace them with</p><p></p><p>Woodson</p><p>Hawk</p><p>Poppinga</p><p>Underwood</p><p>Manual</p><p>Pickett</p><p>Robinson</p><p>Jennings</p><p>Moll</p><p>Coston</p><p>Colledge</p><p>Spitz</p><p>Lee</p><p>Morency</p><p>Herron</p><p>Miree</p><p>Hodge</p><p>Bush</p><p>Collins</p><p>Rayner</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And then we get what we have got now. </p><p></p><p></p><p>All I hear is about how bad Shermans guys were. If Shermans 2004 roster was so bad this logically means that this 2006 roster is hideous.</p><p></p><p>Wolf's drafts have little effect on this. Most of Wolfs guys that were on the roster with Sherman are either still here or TT did not resign them. Thats Ted's fault.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I know you are going to say "we are young" but "we were young" with that 2004 roster. We are YOUNG because Ted wants it like that and wants to get rid of all the experience in favor of younger guys.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Walker was YOUNG - Ted traded him</p><p>Fisher was YOUNG - Ted let him walk</p><p>Carroll was YOUNG - Ted cut him</p><p>Leach was YOUNG - Ted released him</p><p>Thomas was YOUNG - Ted released him</p><p>Chatman was YOUNG - Ted let him go</p><p></p><p></p><p>So Ted Thompson's YOUNG guys can improve but if Ted didn't draft you then you just are what you are?</p><p></p><p></p><p>What did these guys get 2-3 years? In 2-3 years if Poppinga,Collins, Underwood, Moll, Colledge, etc don't improve are we going to cut em and start over?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pyledriver80, post: 94338, member: 194"] [b]Re: [DEBATE] Thompson Vs ... (Overall impressions of TT/MM/etc.)[/b] But why is it so young? We were not exactly an Old team in 2004. I'm talking personel wise Walker Wahle Rivera Chatman Fisher Roman Carroll Lenon Sharper Hawthorne Thomas Navies Peterson Jackson Diggs Davenport Leach Longwell Now you lose all these guys who won the division title and replace them with Woodson Hawk Poppinga Underwood Manual Pickett Robinson Jennings Moll Coston Colledge Spitz Lee Morency Herron Miree Hodge Bush Collins Rayner And then we get what we have got now. All I hear is about how bad Shermans guys were. If Shermans 2004 roster was so bad this logically means that this 2006 roster is hideous. Wolf's drafts have little effect on this. Most of Wolfs guys that were on the roster with Sherman are either still here or TT did not resign them. Thats Ted's fault. I know you are going to say "we are young" but "we were young" with that 2004 roster. We are YOUNG because Ted wants it like that and wants to get rid of all the experience in favor of younger guys. Walker was YOUNG - Ted traded him Fisher was YOUNG - Ted let him walk Carroll was YOUNG - Ted cut him Leach was YOUNG - Ted released him Thomas was YOUNG - Ted released him Chatman was YOUNG - Ted let him go So Ted Thompson's YOUNG guys can improve but if Ted didn't draft you then you just are what you are? What did these guys get 2-3 years? In 2-3 years if Poppinga,Collins, Underwood, Moll, Colledge, etc don't improve are we going to cut em and start over? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
tynimiller
shockerx
Latest posts
The Crew - 2026
Latest: weeds
Today at 5:31 AM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: El Guapo
Yesterday at 10:50 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 5:13 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 12:42 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 11:14 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
[DEBATE] Staff
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
