Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="warhawk" data-source="post: 94237" data-attributes="member: 431">Re: [DEBATE] Thompson Vs. ...so it's just an assumption on my part that MS's draft picks didn't make a hell of a lot of difference and no major impact on this team?It's an assumption on my part that after being ONE PLAY from the big show in '03 that what happened in '04 was an indication we were heading in the wrong direction?Where's the assumption that the talent level had dropped drastically from the beginning of '03 to the beginning of '05? Look at the rosters!What's an assumption is to say TT inherited a team that should have been at least 10-4 because that's what they were the year before. This gives no credit to teams that had been building talent for years and had surpassed us.If you didn't notice the Bears have built one big, bad, ***** of a front seven for example. I'd say they are just a little bit better than ours at this time. Is that an assumption as well? Many teams had surpassed us in talent. Hello.Of course that's TT's fault. He should have been able to put out as good a front seven as those guys AND keep Rivera, Wahle, and whoever the heck else with $2 mil bucks in '05 and had us back in the SB this year.I mean, after all, he inherited all that talent that certainly put us at an equal level to our competitors. Ummmm Hmmmm.</blockquote>

Total: 726 (members: 3, guests: 723)