Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
Dark Horse Candidates
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Heyjoe4" data-source="post: 1032435" data-attributes="member: 13032"><p>Interesting article in the JS this week about the kind of player Gluten likes - big, long, fast- really meaning tall, long wingspan, and an exceptional 40 time - all leading to exceptional RAS scores. And he makes very, very few exceptions to the physical characteristics a player must meet to be drafted.</p><p></p><p>(There are some interesting exceptions, some that have failed - Amari Rodgers - and some that have succeeded - Jayden Reed). Karl Brooks is another example of a guy without the characteristics the Packers like. He was a 6th round pick and had an impressive rookie year on the DL. In college, the Packers saw him as a "man amongst boys".)</p><p></p><p>And this makes sense. Every year it seems these guys become bigger and faster, at every position (not including specialists). I know this is obvious, but I'm amazed at the athleticism these guys achieve every year without any chemical assistance (well, I think without any chemical assistance).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Heyjoe4, post: 1032435, member: 13032"] Interesting article in the JS this week about the kind of player Gluten likes - big, long, fast- really meaning tall, long wingspan, and an exceptional 40 time - all leading to exceptional RAS scores. And he makes very, very few exceptions to the physical characteristics a player must meet to be drafted. (There are some interesting exceptions, some that have failed - Amari Rodgers - and some that have succeeded - Jayden Reed). Karl Brooks is another example of a guy without the characteristics the Packers like. He was a 6th round pick and had an impressive rookie year on the DL. In college, the Packers saw him as a "man amongst boys".) And this makes sense. Every year it seems these guys become bigger and faster, at every position (not including specialists). I know this is obvious, but I'm amazed at the athleticism these guys achieve every year without any chemical assistance (well, I think without any chemical assistance). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
The Crew - 2026
Latest: weeds
Today at 6:44 AM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
R
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: rmontro
Yesterday at 8:07 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: tynimiller
Yesterday at 6:14 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 5:41 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 3:06 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
Dark Horse Candidates
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top