Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
D.Adam or Boykin
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TJV" data-source="post: 572020" data-attributes="member: 4300"><p>Actually that would shoot it down to 2-5 but that makes no sense IMO anyway. If you are going to arbitrarily ignore 4 of his playoff wins, why not arbitrarily ignore a corresponding 4 playoff losses? The result is an equally meaningless 2-1. It's one thing to project the current season's outcome, but IMO it's meaningless to arbitrarily ignore part of his record. There's no need to: With regard to the past, why not stick with the facts? It's a fact how long ago the Super Bowl season was, if that's your point, but ignoring it looks agenda driven. And just imagine any GM ignoring the Super Bowl run that appears on his resume too.</p><p></p><p>For others: Don't get me wrong, I presented what I predict will be Thompson (and Murphy's) point of view regarding McCarthy's extension.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TJV, post: 572020, member: 4300"] Actually that would shoot it down to 2-5 but that makes no sense IMO anyway. If you are going to arbitrarily ignore 4 of his playoff wins, why not arbitrarily ignore a corresponding 4 playoff losses? The result is an equally meaningless 2-1. It's one thing to project the current season's outcome, but IMO it's meaningless to arbitrarily ignore part of his record. There's no need to: With regard to the past, why not stick with the facts? It's a fact how long ago the Super Bowl season was, if that's your point, but ignoring it looks agenda driven. And just imagine any GM ignoring the Super Bowl run that appears on his resume too. For others: Don't get me wrong, I presented what I predict will be Thompson (and Murphy's) point of view regarding McCarthy's extension. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
R
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: rmontro
Yesterday at 8:07 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: tynimiller
Yesterday at 6:14 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 5:41 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 3:06 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
M
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: mradtke66
Yesterday at 2:30 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
D.Adam or Boykin
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top