1. Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!

    Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers. You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user.

    Sign Up or

    Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions. Furthermore, we hide most of the ads once you register as a member!
    Dismiss Notice

Cullen Jenkins signs a 4-year deal

Discussion in 'Packer Fan Forum' started by wils0646, Feb 26, 2007.

  1. wils0646

    wils0646 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2005
    Messages:
    187
    Ratings:
    +1
  2. porky88

    porky88 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2006
    Messages:
    3,991
    Ratings:
    +0
    So far it's been a good off season and free agency hasn't even started yet. Favre returns for another year, Harris got his deal, and Jenkins is locked up for 4 years.
     
  3. tromadz

    tromadz Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2005
    Messages:
    1,000
    Ratings:
    +3
    I cant wait to see the specifics and yearly breakdown.

    Things are going GREAT and it's not even march yet.
     
  4. pack_in_black

    pack_in_black Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2006
    Messages:
    1,876
    Ratings:
    +0
    This is awesome! :thumbsup:
    Compared to two years ago, even last year, this offseason has been extremely worry-free. I think that the 'settled' feeling of Brett coming back has made these transactions a lot smoother.

    Eh, maybe TT's just a good GM? :shrug:
     
  5. gopackgo

    gopackgo Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2006
    Messages:
    730
    Ratings:
    +0
    So are there still fans that think that Ted can't get the job done? This is just another good deal to shut up that garbage.
     
  6. retiredgrampa

    retiredgrampa Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2005
    Messages:
    804
    Ratings:
    +0
    No negatives that I can see in this deal. It's caused barely a ripple againest the cap so the money for FA is still there. If Ahman re-ups I expect another cap friendly deal although not as vanilla as Jenkins deal since TT won't go for a long-term deal just to spread out the SB. I would guess that Adalius Thomas is no longer at the top of the list, either. But I hope TE and S still are. I want the draft to be BPA from the get-go.
     
  7. PackerLegend

    PackerLegend Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2006
    Messages:
    1,947
    Ratings:
    +0
    Good signing if he plays like he did those last few games hot damn! Our D-line has alot of depth and some of the young players are starting to emerge.
     
  8. Cubanpenguin

    Cubanpenguin Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2006
    Messages:
    111
    Ratings:
    +0
    I wouldn't be so sure about that. I could really see him taking the strong side from Poppinga, even though Brady has done a decent job Thomas would be a huge improvement.
     
  9. porky88

    porky88 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2006
    Messages:
    3,991
    Ratings:
    +0
    If the Packers sign Thomas he'll be used as a DE in the 4-3. He's a 3-4 LB or a 4-3 DE. I don't believe signing him now is out of the question. Thomas, Kampman, Pickett, Jenkins, and Williams makes for one heck of a rotation with our Line and it'd only make it easier for our secondary and backers to make plays. Thomas is going to demand a lot of money and Green Bay would need to get in a bidding war for him. We’ll see though but I wouldn’t mind having him here.
     
  10. packedhouse01

    packedhouse01 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2005
    Messages:
    1,560
    Ratings:
    +1
    That's a lot of money and a long contract if he doesn't pan out.
     
  11. CaliforniaCheez

    CaliforniaCheez Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2005
    Messages:
    2,486
    Ratings:
    +0
    Cullen Jenkins agrees to sign a 4-year deal

    If the up front money is more roster bonus than signing bonus this could be an enhancement of the long term cap position of the team.

    We will know more once the agreement is signed and submitted.
     
  12. MajicMan

    MajicMan Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Messages:
    211
    Ratings:
    +0
    Nice. Love the motor on Jenkins. Always finds a way to contribute. Good news.
     
  13. Raider Pride

    Raider Pride Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2005
    Messages:
    1,868
    Ratings:
    +2
    T.T. just screwed up BIG TIME!

    What a joke... That much money for a guy who may be a risk. And he is a RISK. Cap money has been wasted. This is a scam! My God why can you all not see the hatred T.T. has for Brett.

    This is just another example of how T.T. wants to make sure that Brett Fails so T.T. can get rid of Brett. If the Packers fail on Defence then it will force Brett to fail by being in horrible field position.

    T.T. Just wants to get rid of Brett as fast as possible.

    Oh... By the way... Raider Prides password was so predictable I am back and you can not get rid of me.

    Signed....

    DePack
     
  14. gopackgo

    gopackgo Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2006
    Messages:
    730
    Ratings:
    +0
    password=iheartal

    pretty funny, RP!
     
  15. all about da packers

    all about da packers Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Messages:
    7,033
    Ratings:
    +0
    I think you bring up a great point.

    Jenkins is good, but he has been injured and only performed good for 1/4 of the year as a starter.

    It could be a risk, but really with the demand of DEs this year, I think it was worth a shot. I'd have made the 4th year an option year, but I'm not a cap guy.
     
  16. slackerbacker

    slackerbacker Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2004
    Messages:
    228
    Ratings:
    +0
    Just to piggyback on a few of the detractors comments: Anyone believe we could have tendered Jenkins, watched how he played for a season @ DE, and then spent the money on him long term?

    I'm sure it may have cost us a little more in the long run, but we could have used the money spent for additional talent while Favre is here too.

    If I'm not mistaken, GB has spent approx 10M on two guys (Harris and Jenkins) that were essentially already under contract?? Are we currently winning w/ these two; could the money spent have been better used on new additional talent to improve the teams chances at a playoff run??
     
  17. all about da packers

    all about da packers Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Messages:
    7,033
    Ratings:
    +0
    Good point you raise slackerbacker.

    As for spending 10 million on 2 guys already under contract, Jenkins was a free agent, so he would have needed a new deal anyways.

    As for the tendering Jenkins suggestion, I thought that myself. The only things I believe may have made such an option less desirable would have been Jenkins having a big season, asking for a big payday and the Packers refusing. This might create the wrong impression that the Packers are too cheap, and aren't willing to reward all of their players that perform big.

    The Packers have just started to shed the image of being cheap due to the Walker fiasco IMO, and having that sort of thing happen again would overshadow Harris's extension and the new contracts for Pickett and Kampman.
     
  18. tromadz

    tromadz Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2005
    Messages:
    1,000
    Ratings:
    +3
    wow, another one of my posts got deleted...for no reason.

    EDIT: By Porky
     
  19. slackerbacker

    slackerbacker Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2004
    Messages:
    228
    Ratings:
    +0
    The Packers likely would have placed the $1.3 million second-round tender on Jenkins in restricted free agency, meaning another team would have had to give up a second-round pick to sign him. Instead, Jenkins will make just under $7 million this year and about $9.5 million over the first two years of the deal, Levy said. The Packers have close to $25 million in salary-cap room this year, so absorbing the deal financially was no problem.


    A RFA no?? And the problem is he may not hold up, his short lived productivity against the Viks, Lions and Bears may not continue and there's at least 2 or 3 Mill that could have been used to sign someone else. Most everyone IN the NFL realize we need more playmakers....did this move help this short fall while Favre and the other core vets are here and producing??
     
  20. digsthepack

    digsthepack Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Messages:
    2,486
    Ratings:
    +0
    What ever happened to DePack?

    RP? Anyone?
     
  21. longtimefan

    longtimefan Super Moderator Staff Member Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2005
    Messages:
    17,837
    Ratings:
    +3,483
    Read AADP post on Andrew...but you are right, this is another very good job by the PACKERS to get him signed
     
  22. digsthepack

    digsthepack Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Messages:
    2,486
    Ratings:
    +0
    Jenkins is a player that has gotten better every year, and who works hard to get better. The time and price were right for him to remain a Packer.

    If Thomas is signed, KGB becomes draft-day trade bait.
     
  23. pack_in_black

    pack_in_black Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2006
    Messages:
    1,876
    Ratings:
    +0
    Wait... so if TT doesn't get players signed, what is the purpose of a GM?
     
  24. bozz_2006

    bozz_2006 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2006
    Messages:
    4,576
    Ratings:
    +652
    generally managing
     
  25. porky88

    porky88 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2006
    Messages:
    3,991
    Ratings:
    +0
    Pro Football Weekly

    Wow I'm a little shocked to see that kind of respect giving to Jenkins.
     

Share This Page