Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Concern should be the 49ers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Croak" data-source="post: 403967" data-attributes="member: 2367"><p>The only way to measure is to put the teams both on the field. Strength of schedule gets too convoluted to mean anything, so it is basically worthless, unless you have some vegas supercomputer crunching the numbers of all the teams and their ancilliary games, etc. Then, other factors, weather, injuries, etc all have to come into play. Unless we have that kind of data all we have is conjecture until the teams meet. This is gonna be long, but let me lay it out;</p><p></p><p><u>SF Schedule with secondary games.</u></p><p>Seattle - SF, <strong>Pit</strong>, Az, <strong>Atl</strong>, <strong>NyG</strong>, Clev, Cin, Dal, <strong>Balt</strong></p><p>Dallas -<strong> NyJ</strong>,SF,Wash,<strong> Det</strong>, <strong>NE</strong>, StL, Phil, Sea, <strong>Buf</strong></p><p>Cincinnatti - Clev, Den, SF, <strong>Buf</strong>, Jack, Ind, Sea, Ten, <strong>Pitt</strong></p><p>Philly - StL, <strong>Atl</strong>, <strong>NyG</strong>, SF, <strong>Buf</strong>, Wash, Dal, <strong>Chic</strong>, Az</p><p>Tampa - <strong>Det</strong>, Min,<strong> Atl</strong>, Ind, SF,<strong> No (2x),</strong> <strong>Chic</strong>, <strong>Hou</strong></p><p>Detroit - TB, KC, Min, Dal,<strong> Chi (2x)</strong>, SF, <strong>Atl</strong>, Den</p><p>Cleveland - Cin, Ind, Mia, Ten, <strong>Bal</strong>, Sea, SF, <strong>Hou</strong>, StL</p><p>Washington - <strong>NyG</strong>, Az, Dal, StL, Phi, Car, <strong>Buf</strong>, SF, Mia</p><p>New York G - Was, StL, Phi, Az, Sea, <strong>Buf</strong>, Mia,<strong> Ne</strong>, SF</p><p></p><p><u>GB Schedule with secondary games</u></p><p>New Orl - GB, <strong>Chic</strong>, <strong>Hou</strong>, Jac, Car, TB, Ind, StL, <strong>Atln</strong></p><p>Carolina - Az, GB, Jack, <strong>Chi</strong>, <strong>NO</strong>, <strong>Atl</strong>, Was, Min, Ten</p><p>Chicago - <strong>Atl</strong>, <strong>NO</strong>, GB, Car, <strong>Det (x2),</strong> Min, TB, Phil</p><p>Denver - Oak, Cin, Ten, GB, SD, Mia, <strong>Det,</strong> Oak, KC</p><p>Atlanta - <strong>Chi</strong>, Phi, TB, Sea, GB, Car,<strong> Det</strong>, Ind, <strong>NO</strong></p><p>St. Louis - Phi, <strong>NyG</strong>, <strong>Balt</strong>, Wash, GB, Dal, <strong>No</strong>, Az, Clev</p><p>Minny - SD, TB, <strong>Det</strong>, Kc, AZ, <strong>Chi</strong>, GB(2x), Car</p><p>San Diego - Min, <strong>NE</strong>, KC(2x), Mia, Den, <strong>NyJ</strong>, GB, Oak</p><p>Minny - SD, TB, <strong>Det</strong>, Kc, AZ, <strong>Chi</strong>, GB(2x), Car</p><p></p><p>Now this is the real subjective part for this little graphic. I bolded the teams *I* think are pretty good (without bolding the main team in question). So there is little real difference between the two teams this far down the rack. But to prove my earlier point, we now have to ask what is the schedule for each of the tertiary teams, etc., and it keeps going.</p><p></p><p>I know others will think some teams like TB should be included in good teams, but I haven't put them there yet.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Croak, post: 403967, member: 2367"] The only way to measure is to put the teams both on the field. Strength of schedule gets too convoluted to mean anything, so it is basically worthless, unless you have some vegas supercomputer crunching the numbers of all the teams and their ancilliary games, etc. Then, other factors, weather, injuries, etc all have to come into play. Unless we have that kind of data all we have is conjecture until the teams meet. This is gonna be long, but let me lay it out; [U]SF Schedule with secondary games.[/U] Seattle - SF, [B]Pit[/B], Az, [B]Atl[/B], [B]NyG[/B], Clev, Cin, Dal, [B]Balt[/B] Dallas -[B] NyJ[/B],SF,Wash,[B] Det[/B], [B]NE[/B], StL, Phil, Sea, [B]Buf[/B] Cincinnatti - Clev, Den, SF, [B]Buf[/B], Jack, Ind, Sea, Ten, [B]Pitt[/B] Philly - StL, [B]Atl[/B], [B]NyG[/B], SF, [B]Buf[/B], Wash, Dal, [B]Chic[/B], Az Tampa - [B]Det[/B], Min,[B] Atl[/B], Ind, SF,[B] No (2x),[/B] [B]Chic[/B], [B]Hou[/B] Detroit - TB, KC, Min, Dal,[B] Chi (2x)[/B], SF, [B]Atl[/B], Den Cleveland - Cin, Ind, Mia, Ten, [B]Bal[/B], Sea, SF, [B]Hou[/B], StL Washington - [B]NyG[/B], Az, Dal, StL, Phi, Car, [B]Buf[/B], SF, Mia New York G - Was, StL, Phi, Az, Sea, [B]Buf[/B], Mia,[B] Ne[/B], SF [U]GB Schedule with secondary games[/U] New Orl - GB, [B]Chic[/B], [B]Hou[/B], Jac, Car, TB, Ind, StL, [B]Atln[/B] Carolina - Az, GB, Jack, [B]Chi[/B], [B]NO[/B], [B]Atl[/B], Was, Min, Ten Chicago - [B]Atl[/B], [B]NO[/B], GB, Car, [B]Det (x2),[/B] Min, TB, Phil Denver - Oak, Cin, Ten, GB, SD, Mia, [B]Det,[/B] Oak, KC Atlanta - [B]Chi[/B], Phi, TB, Sea, GB, Car,[B] Det[/B], Ind, [B]NO[/B] St. Louis - Phi, [B]NyG[/B], [B]Balt[/B], Wash, GB, Dal, [B]No[/B], Az, Clev Minny - SD, TB, [B]Det[/B], Kc, AZ, [B]Chi[/B], GB(2x), Car San Diego - Min, [B]NE[/B], KC(2x), Mia, Den, [B]NyJ[/B], GB, Oak Minny - SD, TB, [B]Det[/B], Kc, AZ, [B]Chi[/B], GB(2x), Car Now this is the real subjective part for this little graphic. I bolded the teams *I* think are pretty good (without bolding the main team in question). So there is little real difference between the two teams this far down the rack. But to prove my earlier point, we now have to ask what is the schedule for each of the tertiary teams, etc., and it keeps going. I know others will think some teams like TB should be included in good teams, but I haven't put them there yet. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Firethorn1001
edensmage
AKCheese
Azpackfan4
Latest posts
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: AKCheese
33 minutes ago
Draft Talk
2024 3rd Rd #91 Ty’Ron Hopper LB
Latest: DoURant
Yesterday at 11:10 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 3rd round #88 MarShawn Lloyd RB
Latest: DoURant
Yesterday at 11:01 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
I had This Nightmare
Latest: Poppa San
Yesterday at 10:58 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
S
2024 Draft Prospect Discussions
Latest: Schultz
Yesterday at 10:41 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Concern should be the 49ers
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top