Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Cobb on trading block
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="sschind" data-source="post: 783652" data-attributes="member: 10247"><p>I can only assume that any team interested in trading for Cobb would be allowed to talk to him and try to work out some sort of an extension before hand. Either that or the trade is contingent on an extension being worked out by a certain date or the trade is voided. I'm not sure how either of those things work but I'm certain I have seen something similar before. If not I also find it unlikely that any team is going to pay his salary for a possible 1 year rental and if they do I can't see them willing to give up much for him. A conditional 5th rounder at best would be my guess unless a long term deal could be worked out it could go higher. I would also think that if he were allowed to walk next year we would get at least that in a comp pick. </p><p></p><p> The Packers may have decided to go all in on the youth movement and rather than risk losing promising rookie they have decided to get what they can for RC now and take advantage of any cap savings. If it happens it may very well work out that any WR who takes his spot will put up the same numbers as Cobb would have but with the inexperience of the rest of the group I wouldn't be too excited about it. He could put up 60/600/6 and we would be left wondering if that is all RC would have gotten or if we left a lot more on the table so to speak and we would never know. </p><p></p><p>As far as the Raiders go I wouldn't put too much stock in comments that they are not interested in trading Mack. They may be true but as snoops says that could change tomorrow if the right deal comes along. I have no doubt they have been fielding offers and as of yet nothing has been good enough for them to say yes. </p><p></p><p>On the surface I would say nay to trading him simply because of the lack of experience in the rest of the WR corps but in the end it all depends. What do we get in return? Who is his replacement and how does he do? What do we do with the cap savings? If it happens and we get a day 2 pick and a guy who goes 100/1000/10 and it helps get a Rodgers deal done then I'll be the first one to say great job Gute.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="sschind, post: 783652, member: 10247"] I can only assume that any team interested in trading for Cobb would be allowed to talk to him and try to work out some sort of an extension before hand. Either that or the trade is contingent on an extension being worked out by a certain date or the trade is voided. I'm not sure how either of those things work but I'm certain I have seen something similar before. If not I also find it unlikely that any team is going to pay his salary for a possible 1 year rental and if they do I can't see them willing to give up much for him. A conditional 5th rounder at best would be my guess unless a long term deal could be worked out it could go higher. I would also think that if he were allowed to walk next year we would get at least that in a comp pick. The Packers may have decided to go all in on the youth movement and rather than risk losing promising rookie they have decided to get what they can for RC now and take advantage of any cap savings. If it happens it may very well work out that any WR who takes his spot will put up the same numbers as Cobb would have but with the inexperience of the rest of the group I wouldn't be too excited about it. He could put up 60/600/6 and we would be left wondering if that is all RC would have gotten or if we left a lot more on the table so to speak and we would never know. As far as the Raiders go I wouldn't put too much stock in comments that they are not interested in trading Mack. They may be true but as snoops says that could change tomorrow if the right deal comes along. I have no doubt they have been fielding offers and as of yet nothing has been good enough for them to say yes. On the surface I would say nay to trading him simply because of the lack of experience in the rest of the WR corps but in the end it all depends. What do we get in return? Who is his replacement and how does he do? What do we do with the cap savings? If it happens and we get a day 2 pick and a guy who goes 100/1000/10 and it helps get a Rodgers deal done then I'll be the first one to say great job Gute. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Transfer portal and NIL Money, how they have changed college sports".
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Yesterday at 8:09 PM
College Sports
2022 Draft Romeo Doubs #132
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Yesterday at 7:55 PM
Draft Talk
NFC North Draft Review (2025)
Latest: Calebs Revenge
Yesterday at 4:57 PM
Draft Talk
Starting 5 - CB
Latest: gopkrs
Yesterday at 1:37 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Mediocre punters from da past and other things....
Latest: Calebs Revenge
Yesterday at 10:39 AM
NFL Discussions
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Cobb on trading block
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Transfer portal and NIL Money, how they have changed college sports".
