Just wondered if some people felt the same way I did watching the game.
The staff knew they had three players on the O-Line with very limited experience as starters going up aganst one of the better defensive fronts in the NFL. But yet they chose to leave Bret Favre and Davenport in the game.
Lose Favre for what? A preseason game? And Davenport is coming off an injury as it is.
And I really had to wonder what McCarthy and Co. were thinking by having Woodson back on punts.
How much did the Packers shell out for the guy?
Woodson has had injury problems every year since 2001 and they take a chance of losing him by putting him back on punts in a preseeason game? Maybe they missed the Jason Sehorn debacle a few years back and how much it helped the Giants and his career overall.
I just don't see any sense in having Woodson out there.
The staff knew they had three players on the O-Line with very limited experience as starters going up aganst one of the better defensive fronts in the NFL. But yet they chose to leave Bret Favre and Davenport in the game.
Lose Favre for what? A preseason game? And Davenport is coming off an injury as it is.
And I really had to wonder what McCarthy and Co. were thinking by having Woodson back on punts.
How much did the Packers shell out for the guy?
Woodson has had injury problems every year since 2001 and they take a chance of losing him by putting him back on punts in a preseeason game? Maybe they missed the Jason Sehorn debacle a few years back and how much it helped the Giants and his career overall.
I just don't see any sense in having Woodson out there.