I wouldn't say San Fran, Seattle, Baltimore, and New England are failures in the draft. Would you?
Look at how much better our top 2 picks made us last year. Bottom line. We got worse, not better, by relying so much on the draft class. That is a fact.
San Fran and Seattle were built mostly with high picks due to many losing seasons. Baltimore just won with mostly their players (Reed, Suggs, Rice, Lewis, Flacco, Torrey Smith, Krueger, the list goes on and on). While Boldin was a good pickup for them, they didn't exactly hit paydirt with Derrick Mason. Now those guys are gone and they have been signing everyone they can to stay competitive.
As stated earlier, BB is not the best at drafting in certain areas. Yeah, he has hit on some fa's, but Moss didn't last long, and did nothing before coming to NE in Oakland, then going to 2 more teams the same year NE let him loose. Haynesworth didn't do crap. Seau wasn't exactly a HOF type of player there, and don't even start with how the defense declined after BB failed to keep his own players. the list of NE grown defensive players that left never to be truly replaced is now long. As is the number of years since NE last won the big one.
And yes, our defense did get better. Grow, develop and resign is a much better way to be competitive each year than sign aging players let go by another team. why overpay to have someone another team, one that has had them for a while, didn't think was worth the money? And no team is perfect. Some are great on O, some are great on D, some are good at both, but none are great in all areas of football.
Learn to love being a competitive team nearly every year rather than having a great year followed by mediocrity or worse. There is no perfect plan to win every year. Trust those that keep us competitive. My Charger friends would kill, absolutely KILL to have our complaints.