Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 1098849" data-attributes="member: 7261">While it was already a sunk cost of having Clark on the roster in the future, it was kind of a "hidden" immediate (2 years) cost to the Packers to trade him.  You can't trade away already accrued cap (Clark's $35M).  Meaning, you can't trade the player and his dead cap hits.  The only thing the Packers were able to trade away with Clark was any future contractual money due to him and spready that dead cap hit out over 2 seasons.Sometimes, in a situation where a players current contract (future money) is too steep for the team wanting to trade for the player, the current team will take on part of the contract.</blockquote>

Total: 1,802 (members: 2, guests: 1,800)